Evaluation of intraocular pressure and other biomechanical parameters to distinguish between subclinical keratoconus and healthy corneas

Peris-Martínez, Cristina ; Díez-Ajenjo, M.A. ; García-Domene, M.C. ; Pinazo-Durán, Mª Dolores ; Luque-Cobija, M.J. ; Del Buey-Sayas, Mª Angeles (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Ortí-Navarro, Susana

Resumen: Purpose: To assess the main corneal response differences between normal and subclinical keratoconus (SCKC) with a Corvis® ST device. (2) Material and Methods: We selected 183 eyes of normal patients, of a mean age of 33 ± 9 years and 16 eyes of patients with SCKC of a similar mean age. We measured best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and corneal topography with a Pentacam HD device to select the SCKC group. Biomechanical measurements were performed using the Corvis® ST device. We carried out a non-parametric analysis of the data with SPSS software (Wilcoxon signed rank-test). (3) Results: We found statistically significant differences between the control and SCKC groups in some corneal biomechanical parameters: first and second applanation time (p = 0.05 and p = 0.02), maximum deformation amplitude (p = 0.016), highest concavity radius (p = 0.007), and second applanation length and corneal velocity ((p = 0.039 and p = 0.016). (4) Conclusions: Our results show that the use of normalised biomechanical parameters provided by noncontact tonometry, combined with a discriminant function theory, is a useful tool for detecting subclinical keratoconus.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091905

Año: 2021

Publicado en: Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, 9 (2021), 1905 [9 pp.]
ISSN: 2077-0383

Factor impacto JCR: 4.964 (2021)

Categ. JCR: MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL rank: 55 / 172 = 0.32 (2021) - Q2 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 4.4 - Medicine (Q2)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.04 - Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)

Área (Departamento): Área Oftalmología (Dpto. Cirugía)