Sex and tree rings: Females neither grow less nor are less water-use efficient than males in four dioecious tree species
Resumen: Females of woody dioecious species usually expend more resources on reproduction than males. Therefore, it is expected that females incur greater costs of reproduction than males, and, as a result, trade-offs between reproduction and growth should emerge. The aim of this study is to test those hypotheses by analyzing the differences between genders regarding radial growth (basal area increment) and wood carbon isotope composition (d13C), a proxy of water-use efficiency. We compared these two variables in males and females of four dioecious tree species inhabiting drought-prone Mediterranean sites in Spain (Pistacia terebinthus, Ilex aquifolium, Juniperus thurifera and Ailanthus altissima). We analyzed the influence of sex on the radial growth patterns throughout the tree life considering the growth stage of individuals, the differences in the response of genders to climate variables (air temperature, precipitation and drought severity), and the d13C during a severe drought period. One site was studied for each species and 21–33 trees per species were sampled in each site. No differences in growth were found between genders for any of the four species throughout their life span. No significant interactions between gender and precipitation were found, although A. altissima males were more responsive to summer (June-July) temperature. No differences in d13C were found between genders excepting for P. terebinthus, indicating that the males of this species show a less efficient water use during drought events than the females. These results do not support the broad assumption that females of woody dioecious plants show lower growth and are less water-use efficient than males or that they respond differently to precipitation variability, except for P. terebinthus during drought events. Further analyses could be performed in other dioecious species inhabiting seasonally dry regions to confirm or reject our conclusions.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2022.125944
Año: 2022
Publicado en: DENDROCHRONOLOGIA 73 (2022), 125944 [8 pp.]
ISSN: 1125-7865

Factor impacto JCR: 3.0 (2022)
Categ. JCR: FORESTRY rank: 14 / 69 = 0.203 (2022) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL rank: 23 / 49 = 0.469 (2022) - Q2 - T2

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 5.1 - Environmental Science (Q2) - Agricultural and Biological Sciences (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.778 - Plant Science (Q1) - Ecology (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/RTI2018-096884-B-C31
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Area Ingeniería Agroforestal (Dpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-03-18-13:13:34)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos por área > Ingeniería Agroforestal



 Registro creado el 2022-06-08, última modificación el 2024-03-19


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)