Improving sustainability teaching by grouping and interrelating pedagogical approaches and sustainability competences: Evidence from 15 Worldwide Higher Education Institutions
Resumen: There has been increasing research on pedagogical approaches, sustainability competences, and how to connect them in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This paper's aim is to provide deeper insights into the system of pedagogical approaches and sustainability competences, as well as how these interrelate. A survey was developed to investigate sustainability teaching in 15 HEIs. The survey was sent to educators of each HEI from which 668 responses were obtained. The responses were analysed in a five-step process: (1) descriptive statistics; (2) Pearson correlations; (3) principal component analyses (PCAs) to detect groups; (4) Pearson correlations between the groups; and (5) regressions. The first step provided the base to carry out the PCAs, from which three groups for the pedagogical approaches (Universal, Social, and Environmental) and three for the sustainability competences (Extrospective-social, Introspective-personal, and Cogitative-processual) were obtained. The correlations between the groups showed that: (1) the competences are closely interrelated; (2) the pedagogical approaches are somehow interrelated; and (3) the pedagogical approaches are somehow interrelated to the competences. The regressions showed that the Universal and Social groups would be most suitable to develop all the competences' groups. The Environmental group develops only the cogitative-processual competences' group. The results served as bases to propose the Sustainability Teaching System (STS), which provides deeper insights into the system of pedagogical approaches and sustainability competences by grouping them, as well as showing directionality and strength. To improve sustainability teaching, it is necessary to understand the pedagogical approaches' groups and how they can develop the competences' groups.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2396
Año: 2023
Publicado en: Sustainable Development 31, 1 (2023), 349-359
ISSN: 0968-0802

Factor impacto JCR: 12.5 (2022)
Categ. JCR: GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY rank: 2 / 9 = 0.222 (2022) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING rank: 1 / 40 = 0.025 (2022) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: DEVELOPMENT STUDIES rank: 1 / 42 = 0.024 (2022) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 15.2 - Energy (Q1) - Social Sciences (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 2.283 - Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (Q1) - Development (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Economía Finan. y Contab. (Dpto. Contabilidad y Finanzas)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-07-05-12:46:19)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos



 Registro creado el 2022-11-24, última modificación el 2024-07-05


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)