Optical quality variation of different intraocular lens designs in a model eye: lens placed correctly and in an upside-down position

Lacort, M. ; Pérez-Gracia, J. ; Ares, J. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Remón, L. (Universidad de Zaragoza)

Resumen: Introduction: Intraocular lenses (IOLs) may lose their optical quality if they are not correctly placed inside the capsular bag once implanted. One possible malpositioning of the IOL could be the implantation in an upside-down position. In this work, three aspheric IOLs with different spherical aberration (SA) have been designed and numerically tested to analyse the optical quality variation with the IOL flip, and misalignments, using a theoretical model eye. Methods: Using the commercial optical design software OSLO, the effect of decentration and tilt was evaluated by numerical ray tracing in two conditions: IOL in their designed position and flipped. The Atchison theoretical model eye used. Seven IOL designs of +27.00 diopters were used: a lens with negative SA to correct the corneal SA, a lens to partially correct the corneal SA and a lens to not add any SA to the cornea (aberration-free IOL). These lenses were designed with the aspherical surface located on the anterior and posterior IOL surface. A lens with no aspherical surfaces was also included. For the optical quality analysis, the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and Zernike wavefront aberration coefficients of defocus, astigmatism and primary coma were used. Results: Off-centering and tilting the IOL reduced overall MTF values, and increased wavefront aberration errors. With the IOL correctly positioned within the capsular bag, an aberration-free IOL is the best choice for maintaining optical quality. When the IOL is flipped inside the capsular bag the optical quality changes, with the aberration-free IOL and the IOL without aspheric surfaces providing the worst results. With the lens in an upside-down position, an IOL design to partially correct corneal SA shows the best optical quality results in decentration and tilt. Conclusion: The aberration-free IOL is the best choice when minimal postoperative errors of decentration or tilt are predicted. With IOL flip, the negative SA lens design is the best choice, regarding the root mean square wavefront aberrations. However, in a proper IOL implantation, the IOL designed to partially compensate the corneal SA including asphericity on its posterior surface is the better possible option, even in the presence of decentration or tilt.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.1159/000528504

Año: 2023

Publicado en: OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH 66, 1 (2023), 750–759
ISSN: 0030-3747

Factor impacto JCR: 2.0 (2023)

Categ. JCR: OPHTHALMOLOGY rank: 39 / 95 = 0.411 (2023) - Q2 - T2

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 3.8 - Ophthalmology (Q2) - Sensory Systems (Q3) - Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (Q4)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.838 - Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q2) - Sensory Systems (Q2) - Ophthalmology (Q2) - Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (Q3)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA-FEDER/E44-20R
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA-FSE/E24-20R
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/PID2020-113822RB-C21
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICIU/PID2020-114311RA-I00

Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)

Área (Departamento): Área Óptica (Dpto. Física Aplicada)