000004287 001__ 4287
000004287 005__ 20160204081358.0
000004287 017__ $$aZ-3142-2008
000004287 020__ $$a978-84-9252-117-3
000004287 037__ $$aBOOK--2009-010
000004287 041__ $$aeng
000004287 100__ $$aSaarenpää ,Ahti (ed.)$$basaarenp@ulapland.fi
000004287 245__ $$aLegal privacy
000004287 250__ $$a1ªed.
000004287 260__ $$aZaragoza$$bPrensas Universitarias$$c2008
000004287 300__ $$a306
000004287 490__ $$aLEFIS
000004287 520__ $$aAs a word, legal concept and institution, privacy is exceptionally challenging. It is easy enough to understand but difficult to define and identify. It is not particularly easy to legislate either. For the legislator, privacy very much resembles Tantalus’ fruit: just when it seems to be in reach, it withdraws yet remains temptingly visible.The end result has been an extensive body of legislation in various forms both nationally and internationally.There is more to come, and no end in sight. Privacy is every bit as daunting when considered as a subject to be taught to prospective lawyers and others interested in the law.We are forced to ask where, to whom and how privacy in the legal sense should be taught.As yet privacy does not seem to have a real disciplinary home to call its own in legal research or teaching in any country. Academically, law has thus largely overlooked one of our main fundamental rights – the right to privacy.We have every reason to ask how this is possible and what we can do about it.
000004287 6531_ $$aInternational
000004287 6531_ $$aLaw
000004287 6531_ $$aTechnology
000004287 6531_ $$aLegal procedures
000004287 8560_ $$f509046@celes.unizar.es
000004287 8564_ $$s2053512$$uhttp://zaguan.unizar.es/record/4287/files/BOOK--2009-010.pdf$$zTexto completo
000004287 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:4287$$pbooks
000004287 9102_ $$aFilosofía del derecho$$bDerecho Penal, Filosofía del Derecho e Historia del Derecho
000004287 980__ $$aBOOK$$bPDyFE
000004287 984__ $$apublic