000060851 001__ 60851
000060851 005__ 20210121114540.0
000060851 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.047
000060851 0248_ $$2sideral$$a89760
000060851 037__ $$aART-2015-89760
000060851 041__ $$aeng
000060851 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-7514-3717$$aNicolas, M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000060851 245__ $$aIn vitro comparison of Günther Tulip and Celect filters. Testing filtering efficiency and pressure drop
000060851 260__ $$c2015
000060851 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000060851 5203_ $$aIn this study, the trapping ability of the Günther Tulip and Celect inferior vena cava filters was evaluated. Thrombus capture rates of the filters were tested in vitro in horizontal position with thrombus diameters of 3 and 6. mm and tube diameter of 19. mm. The filters were tested in centered and tilted positions. Sets of 30 clots were injected into the model and the same process was repeated 20 times for each different condition simulated. Pressure drop experienced along the system was also measured and the percentage of clots captured was recorded. The Günther Tulip filter showed superiority in all cases, trapping almost 100% of 6. mm clots both in an eccentric and tilted position and trapping 81.7% of the 3. mm clots in a centered position and 69.3% in a maximum tilted position. The efficiency of all filters tested decreased as the size of the embolus decreased and as the filter was tilted. The injection of 6 clots raised the pressure drop to 4.1. mmHg, which is a reasonable value that does not cause the obstruction of blood flow through the system.
000060851 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/BES-2011-043471$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/DPI2010-20746-C03-01
000060851 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000060851 590__ $$a2.431$$b2015
000060851 591__ $$aENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL$$b24 / 76 = 0.316$$c2015$$dQ2$$eT1
000060851 591__ $$aBIOPHYSICS$$b34 / 72 = 0.472$$c2015$$dQ2$$eT2
000060851 592__ $$a1.264$$b2015
000060851 593__ $$aBiomedical Engineering$$c2015$$dQ1
000060851 593__ $$aBiophysics$$c2015$$dQ1
000060851 593__ $$aSports Science$$c2015$$dQ1
000060851 593__ $$aRehabilitation$$c2015$$dQ1
000060851 593__ $$aOrthopedics and Sports Medicine$$c2015$$dQ1
000060851 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000060851 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0116-2736$$aMalvé, M.
000060851 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0664-5024$$aPeña, E.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000060851 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8375-0354$$aMartínez, M.A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000060851 700__ $$aLeask, R.
000060851 7102_ $$15004$$2605$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ingeniería Mecánica$$cÁrea Mec.Med.Cont. y Teor.Est.
000060851 773__ $$g48, 3 (2015), 504-511$$pJ. biomech.$$tJournal of Biomechanics$$x0021-9290
000060851 8564_ $$s4025529$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/60851/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000060851 8564_ $$s45548$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/60851/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000060851 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:60851$$particulos$$pdriver
000060851 951__ $$a2021-01-21-11:16:01
000060851 980__ $$aARTICLE