Reliability loss with sampling rate reduction
Resumen: High sampling frequency is not usually available in hospital monitoring systems, what can limit the usefulness of the data, namely for repolarization measures. In this work the reliability of beat-to-beat measures using low sampling frequency is quantified with respect to the original high sampling rate. ECG recordings originally at 1000 Hz, including intensive care patients data, were downsampled to 500 Hz and to 250 Hz. Automatic delineation was applied to extract beat-to-beat intervals. The reliability was measured considering concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); the Information-based measure of disagreement (IBMD) was used for agreement quantification. High reliability and low disagreement were generally found. Using the conventional interpretation excellent consistency was found at 250 HZ for more than 68%, 50%, 50% and 58% of the cases for RR, RT, QT and QTc, respectively. Results indicate that at 250 Hz RR, RT, QT and QTc measures are still reliable compared with the values at 1000 Hz.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1109/CIC.2015.7411004
Año: 2016
Publicado en: Computing in Cardiology 42 (2016), 689-692
ISSN: 2325-8861

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/T96
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/FEDER/UID/MAT/00144/2013
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/TEC2013-42140-R
Tipo y forma: Comunicación congreso (Versión definitiva)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2018-11-23-10:32:51)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos



 Registro creado el 2017-10-26, última modificación el 2018-11-23


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)