Assessing gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men
Resumen: Objective: To analyze the construct validity and the internal consistency of the 12-item Bem Sex Role
Inventory (BSRI-12) questionnaire and to study the association between gender stereotypes and sexual
risk practices in men who have sex with men (MSM).
Methods: Cross-sectional study of 601 MSM who voluntarily and anonymously responded to an online
survey on risk practices and gender stereotypes. The BSRI-12 was used to obtain gender stereotypes
(masculine, feminine, undifferentiated and androgynous). For data analysis, exploratory factor analysis
(EFA) of the BSRI-12 and logistic regression were performed.
Results: Two main factors (Cronbach alpha 0.95 and 0.81) were obtained from the EFA. Using the androgynous
roles as the reference category, we found lower odds of engaging in unprotected anal intercourse
(UAI) among those who endorse feminine roles (OR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.29-0.95). Endorsing masculine roles
with alcohol consumption (OR: 1.92; 95%CI: 1.15-3.20) or the undifferentiated when not knowing the
partner’s serological status (OR: 1.55; 95%CI: 1.02-2.35) were associated with higher odds of UAI compared
to those endorsing the androgynous roles. Undifferentiated participants also perform receptive
UAI using poppers (OR: 2.19; 95%CI: 1.24-3.87), and insertive UAI not knowing the serological status of
the sexual partner (OR: 1.69; 95%CI: 1.04-2.76) compared to androgynous participants.
Conclusion: The BSRI is a valid and consistent instrument for identifying gender stereotypes in MSM.
A greater proportion of participants within the undifferentiated and the masculine category engage
in risk practices with the influence of substance consumption and unawareness of their sexual partner’s
serological status. The information obtained may be useful to define intervention and prevention
programs.

Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.05.001
Año: 2017
Publicado en: Gaceta Sanitaria 32, 6 [503-94pp.] (2017), e17-e20
ISSN: 0213-9111

Factor impacto JCR: 1.581 (2017)
Categ. JCR: HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES rank: 62 / 94 = 0.66 (2017) - Q3 - T2
Categ. JCR: PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH rank: 80 / 156 = 0.513 (2017) - Q3 - T2
Categ. JCR: PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH rank: 108 / 180 = 0.6 (2017) - Q3 - T2

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.495 - Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (Q2)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/B124
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Enfermería (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)
Área (Departamento): Área Medic.Prevent.Salud Públ. (Dpto. Microb.Med.Pr.,Sal.Públ.)


Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2019-08-19-09:51:34)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2017-11-07, last modified 2019-08-19


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)