000063395 001__ 63395
000063395 005__ 20200221144232.0
000063395 0248_ $$2sideral$$a102238
000063395 037__ $$aART-2016-102238
000063395 041__ $$aspa
000063395 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0926-0442$$aSancho Rocher, Laura$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000063395 245__ $$aSociología de la stásis: I. El dêmos y los oligarcas en 411 a.C.
000063395 260__ $$c2016
000063395 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000063395 5203_ $$aThis study, which is divided in two papers (I: The Demos and the Oligarchs in 411 BC; and II: The Social Support of the Thirty and that of the Demos in 404/3 BC), evaluates the social support that revolutionary movements in Athens gets at the end of the 5th century BC. Specialists believe that Athenian citizens are split into two parts, depending on whether they are for or against democracy. However, this essay shows that demos’ political consciousness was in fact almost non-existent. Despite its preference for a popular power system, the multitude remains quiet without the direction of its democratic leaders, who act driven not by principles, but by prospects of power or just patriotism. Something similar happens to the leaders of oligarchy: only a few are true ideologists (Antiphont or Critias for example). Most of them just display their discomfort with how democracy has been corrupted by a handful of demagogues, but show that they feel ready to quit the oligarchic project as soon as any further difficulty arises. It is not ideological convictions, but personal motives or their positions on the war, that cause disaffection among revolutionary groups. Therefore it should be taken seriously what Thucydides said about those who are «in the middle» in a stásis, that is, citizens who did not take sides; and about the arguments that «those of the city» (citizens who support the power of the Thirty) expressed during judicial processes and the dokimasíai.
000063395 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/HAR2011-26191
000063395 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000063395 592__ $$a0.13$$b2016
000063395 593__ $$aClassics$$c2016$$dQ2
000063395 593__ $$aLiterature and Literary Theory$$c2016$$dQ2
000063395 593__ $$aHistory$$c2016$$dQ2
000063395 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000063395 7102_ $$13000$$2445$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ciencias de la Antigüed.$$cÁrea Historia Antigua
000063395 773__ $$g104.1 (2016), 5-30$$pAthenaeum$$tAthenaeum$$x0004-6574
000063395 8564_ $$s177883$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/63395/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000063395 8564_ $$s72587$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/63395/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000063395 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:63395$$particulos$$pdriver
000063395 951__ $$a2020-02-21-13:20:07
000063395 980__ $$aARTICLE