International Investment Law and ISDS: Mapping Contemporary Latin America
Resumen: In recent years, the negotiation and conclusion of international investment agreements (IIAs) in Latin America has gone hand-in-hand with a rethinking of investment standards and the elaboration of new IIA models. This is evident, among others, in Brazil’s cooperation and facilitation investment agreements (CFIAs), the continuing negotiations on the creation of a regional dispute settlement centre under the aegis of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), some recently-released investment policy documents and amendments to national arbitration laws for disputes involving the State. The article highlights such developments emphasising the broad spectrum of local approaches that vary from convergence to divergence in order to interpret Latin American countries’ position in the existing investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) system and reveal the role that the sub-continent can play in the future design of ISDS.
Idioma: Inglés
Año: 2016
Publicado en: The journal of world investment & trade 17, 4 (2016), 515-535
ISSN: 1660-7112

Originalmente disponible en: Texto completo de la revista

Factor impacto SCIMAGO:

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S14-3
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/DER2012-36806-JURI
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Dcho.Internacion. Privado (Dpto. Derecho Privado)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2018-10-25-08:51:05)

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2017-12-14, last modified 2018-10-25


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)