<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:creator>García Landa, José Angel</dc:creator>
  <dc:title>Authorial Intention in Literary Hermeneutics: On Two American Theories</dc:title>
  <dc:subject>interpretación</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>crítica</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>objetivismo</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>teoría literaria</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>nueva crítica</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>intención</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>hermenéutica</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>This paper is a critical examination of two antithetical theories on the role of authorial intention in the criticism and interpretation of literature: the New Critics' "intentional fallacy" and E. D. Hirsch's historicist objectivism. A third way is put forward: a regulative objectivism which emerges as a a result of critical debate. </dc:description>
  <dc:date>2012-02-07T15:44:55Z</dc:date>
  <dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/6841</dc:identifier>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
  <dc:coverage>Zaragoza</dc:coverage>
  <dc:audience>Researchers</dc:audience>
  <dc:audience>Students</dc:audience>
  <dc:audience>Librarians</dc:audience>
</dc:dc>

</collection>
