Hormonal and emotional responses to competition using a dyadic approach: Basal testosterone predicts emotional state after a defeat
Resumen: The present study analyzes the testosterone (T), cortisol (C) and emotional response in competitive interactions between dyads, as well as the relationship between basal T and the emotional response. Seventy-two men and women (36 dyads) participated in same-sex dyads in a face-to-face laboratory competition, and thirty-two men and women (16 dyads) carried out the same task in a non-competitive condition. Salivary samples (5 ml of saliva, plastic vials) were provided at three time points (baseline, task, and post-task), and subsequently T (pg/ml) and C (nmol/L) concentrations were measured using ELISA method. Participants completed self-reported measures of emotional valence, emotional arousal and perceived dominance by means of the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), at three time points (pre-task, task, and post-task). Two-level crossed Multilevel Models (MLM) showed a participants' stability in C (Mean ± SEM: baseline: 3.84 ± 0.28, task: 2.92 ± 0.28 and post-task: 2.62 ± 0.3), emotional valence (pre-task: 4 ± 0.06, task: 3.66 ± 0.1 and post-task: 3.84 ± 0.09), arousal (pre-task: 3.29 ± 0.09, task: 3.83 ± 0.09 and post-task: 3.38 ± 0.1) and dominance (pre-task: 3.28 ± 0.08, task: 3.4 ± 0.1 and post-task: 3.44 ± 0.09) values, which in the case of emotional valence and dominance was modulated by time-point, outcome and sex. Furthermore, analyses revealed that opponents' C, arousal and dominance values at one time-point influenced participants' values at the following time-point modulated by outcome, sex and time-point. Moreover, MLM indicated that in loser men, individuals higher in basal T (126.31 ± 6.4) displayed higher negative emotional valence after the defeat (post-task: 3.6 ± 0.21), while in women basal T (99.78 ± 12.6) was not significantly related to post competition emotional valence. These findings reinforce the importance of studying the relationship between hormonal and psychological changes in dyadic competition, and confirm that men and women differ in their psychophysiological responses to competition.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.03.025
Año: 2019
Publicado en: PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR 206 (2019), 106-117
ISSN: 0031-9384

Factor impacto JCR: 2.826 (2019)
Categ. JCR: PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL rank: 4 / 13 = 0.308 (2019) - Q2 - T1
Categ. JCR: BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES rank: 16 / 52 = 0.308 (2019) - Q2 - T1

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.993 - Philosophy (Q1) - Behavioral Neuroscience (Q2) - Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (Q2)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MEC/PSI2013-46889
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MEC/PSI2016-78763
Tipo y forma: Artículo (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Psicobiología (Dpto. Psicología y Sociología)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2020-07-16-08:49:42)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos



 Registro creado el 2020-03-31, última modificación el 2020-07-16


Postprint:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)