<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
<record>
  <controlfield tag="001">101508</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20220426091138.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.1002/ijgo.13178</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">sideral</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">118235</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ART-2020-118235</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">García-Claver, A.</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0470-223X</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Capillary glucose concentration during oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2020</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Access copy available to the general public</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Unrestricted</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Objective: To assess concordance between two point-of-care testing (POCT) devices and the standard laboratory method in screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Huesca. 
Methods: Pregnant women who met criteria for an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and attended the laboratory between October 2017 and November 2018 were recruited in this prospective observational study. Glucose was measured in venous (laboratory) and capillary blood (Accu-Chek or Contour Next glucometers). GDM was diagnosed attending to NDDG criteria for venous samples or capillary-specific cut-off. Linear regression, Passing–Bablok, Bland–Altman, and the kappa coefficient were used to study concordance between POCT and laboratory method. 
Results: Data from 109 women were analyzed (57 for Accu-Chek, 52 for Contour Next). Statistical analyses showed good agreement between both POCT and laboratory method. There were no statistical differences in fasting glucose measurements between capillary and venous samples and both POCT devices meet the ISO 15197 standard. Accu-Chek showed good agreement (k=0.629) regarding the laboratory method in classifying GDM, with an acceptable inter-evaluator bias of 3.5% (P&lt;0.001). 
Conclusion: POCT can be used to obtain fasting values and reduce overall waiting times for patients. Additionally, Accu-Chek can be used to diagnose GDM in remote areas applying specific cut-off values.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="9">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">by-nc-nd</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="590" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">3.561</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">2020</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="591" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNECOLOGY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">20 / 83 = 0.241</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2020</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Q1</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">T1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="592" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0.895</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">2020</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="593" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Obstetrics and Gynecology</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2020</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Q2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="593" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Medicine (miscellaneous)</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2020</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Q2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ramos-Corral, R.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Laviña-Fañanás, C.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Solans-Blecua, I.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Puzo-Foncillas, J.</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Universidad de Zaragoza</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1309-4363</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">1007</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">610</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Universidad de Zaragoza</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Dpto. Medicina, Psiqu. y Derm.</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Area Medicina</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g">150, 2 (2020), 234-240</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">Int. j. gynaecol. obstet.</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0020-7292</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">362973</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/101508/files/texto_completo.pdf</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Postprint</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">1507977</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/101508/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">icon</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Postprint</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o">oai:zaguan.unizar.es:101508</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">articulos</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">driver</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">2022-04-26-08:55:22</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ARTICLE</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
</collection>