000102192 001__ 102192
000102192 005__ 20240503120756.0
000102192 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3233/BMR-191814
000102192 0248_ $$2sideral$$a124185
000102192 037__ $$aART-2021-124185
000102192 041__ $$aeng
000102192 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0026-9224$$aBueno-Gracia, E.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000102192 245__ $$aNormal response to tibial neurodynamic test in asymptomatic subjects
000102192 260__ $$c2021
000102192 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000102192 5203_ $$aBACKGROUND: The straight leg raise test (SLR) is one of the most performed physical tests for mechanosensitivity and impairment of the nervous system. According to the anatomy of the tibial nerve, ankle dorsiflexion and eversion movements could be used to perform the tibial neurodynamic test (TNT). To date, no study has documented the normal responses of the TNT. OBJECTIVE: To document normal responses of the TNT in asymptomatic individuals and to investigate influences from sex and leg dominance. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with 44 asymptomatic volunteer subjects, a total of 88 lower limbs, was carried out. The range of motion (ROM), quality, and distribution of sensory responses were recorded. The hip flexion ROM was measured when subjects reported an intensity of their symptoms of 2/10 (P1) and 8/10 (P2). RESULTS: The mean ROM for hip flexion at P1 was 44.22 ± 13.13 and 66.73 ± 14.30 at P2. Hip flexion was significantly greater at P2 than P1 (p< 0.001). However, it was not different between sex or limbs (p> 0.05). The descriptor of the quality of sensory responses most often used by participants was stretching (88.6% and 87.5% for P1 and P2, respectively) in the popliteal fossa and posterior calf. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the sensory responses of asymptomatic subjects resulting from the TNT. Our findings indicate that TNT responses are independent of the influence of sex or leg dominance.
000102192 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000102192 590__ $$a1.456$$b2021
000102192 592__ $$a0.372$$b2021
000102192 594__ $$a2.3$$b2021
000102192 591__ $$aREHABILITATION$$b58 / 68 = 0.853$$c2021$$dQ4$$eT3
000102192 593__ $$aRehabilitation$$c2021$$dQ2
000102192 591__ $$aORTHOPEDICS$$b70 / 86 = 0.814$$c2021$$dQ4$$eT3
000102192 593__ $$aOrthopedics and Sports Medicine$$c2021$$dQ2
000102192 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000102192 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-9080-0543$$aMalo-Urriés, M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000102192 700__ $$0(orcid)0009-0000-0252-5642$$aMontaner-Cuello, A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000102192 700__ $$aBorrella-Andrés, S.
000102192 700__ $$aLópez-De-Celis, C.
000102192 7102_ $$11006$$2413$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Fisioterapia
000102192 773__ $$g34, 2 (2021), 243-249$$pJ. back musculoskelet. rehabil.$$tJOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION$$x1053-8127
000102192 85641 $$uhttps://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-back-and-musculoskeletal-rehabilitation/bmr191814$$zTexto completo de la revista
000102192 8564_ $$s1185615$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/102192/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000102192 8564_ $$s2199368$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/102192/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000102192 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:102192$$particulos$$pdriver
000102192 951__ $$a2024-05-03-12:03:36
000102192 980__ $$aARTICLE