000102236 001__ 102236
000102236 005__ 20220426091137.0
000102236 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s10862-020-09812-9
000102236 0248_ $$2sideral$$a118262
000102236 037__ $$aART-2020-118262
000102236 041__ $$aeng
000102236 100__ $$aMartínez-Vispo, Carmela
000102236 245__ $$aDoes rumination mediate the effect of depressive symptoms on cigarette dependence and craving in seeking treatment smokers?
000102236 260__ $$c2020
000102236 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000102236 5203_ $$aDespite the advances in understanding the relationship between smoking and depressive symptomatology, scarce research has investigated cognitive variables underlying in such relation. The main aim of this study is to examine the mediating effect of two rumination subtypes (brooding and reflection) in the link between depressive symptoms and both cigarette dependence level and tobacco craving in treatment-seeking smokers. Participants were 275 adult daily smokers seeking treatment to quit smoking (61.5% females; Mage = 45.3 years; SD = 10.9). Multiple mediation analysis was conducted to explore the mediating effects of rumination (brooding and reflection) in the relation between depressive symptoms, cigarette dependence level, and craving. Results showed a significant indirect effect of depressive symptoms through the joint of both rumination subtypes on cigarette dependence (ß = 0.089; 95% BootCI [0.006, 0.168]), and craving (ß = 0.123; 95% BootCI [0.048, 0.205]). The specific analysis of each mediator showed that only brooding subtype had a significant effect on the relation between depressive symptoms and tobacco craving (ß = 0.101; 95% BootCI [0.023, 0.186]). Findings of the present study provide further evidence for the role of rumination in smoking-related variables and for the potential value of introducing rumination-focused interventions into smoking-cessation interventions.
000102236 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO-FEDER/PSI2015-66755-R
000102236 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000102236 590__ $$a2.645$$b2020
000102236 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL$$b76 / 131 = 0.58$$c2020$$dQ3$$eT2
000102236 592__ $$a1.122$$b2020
000102236 593__ $$aClinical Psychology$$c2020$$dQ1
000102236 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000102236 700__ $$aSenra, Carmen
000102236 700__ $$aLópez-Durán, Ana
000102236 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9645-8109$$aFernández del Río, Elena$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000102236 700__ $$aBecoña, Elisardo
000102236 7102_ $$14009$$2740$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicología Social
000102236 773__ $$g2020, 42 (2020), 765–773$$pJ. psychopathol. behav. assess.$$tJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment$$x0882-2689
000102236 8564_ $$s443343$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/102236/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000102236 8564_ $$s1158189$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/102236/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000102236 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:102236$$particulos$$pdriver
000102236 951__ $$a2022-04-26-08:54:25
000102236 980__ $$aARTICLE