<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2020.51</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Huang, Xiang</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lutz, Jack H.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mayordomo, Elvira</dc:creator><dc:creator>Stull, Donald M.</dc:creator><dc:title>Asymptotic divergences and strong dichotomy</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2020-117237</dc:identifier><dc:description>The Schnorr-Stimm dichotomy theorem [31] concerns finite-state gamblers that bet on infinite sequences of symbols taken from a finite alphabet S. The theorem asserts that, for any such sequence S, the following two things are true. (1) If S is not normal in the sense of Borel (meaning that every two strings of equal length appear with equal asymptotic frequency in S), then there is a finite-state gambler that wins money at an infinitely-often exponential rate betting on S. (2) If S is normal, then any finite-state gambler betting on S loses money at an exponential rate betting on S. In this paper we use the Kullback-Leibler divergence to formulate the lower asymptotic divergence div(S||a) of a probability measure a on S from a sequence S over S and the upper asymptotic divergence Div(S||a) of a from S in such a way that a sequence S is a-normal (meaning that every string w has asymptotic frequency a(w) in S) if and only if Div(S||a) = 0. We also use the Kullback-Leibler divergence to quantify the total risk RiskG(w) that a finite-state gambler G takes when betting along a prefix w of S. Our main theorem is a strong dichotomy theorem that uses the above notions to quantify the exponential rates of winning and losing on the two sides of the Schnorr-Stimm dichotomy theorem (with the latter routinely extended from normality to a-normality). Modulo asymptotic caveats in the paper, our strong dichotomy theorem says that the following two things hold for prefixes w of S. (10) The infinitely-often exponential rate of winning in 1 is 2Div(S||a)|w| . (20) The exponential rate of loss in 2 is 2-RiskG(w) . We also use (10) to show that 1 - Div(S||a)/c, where c = log(1/mina¿S a(a)), is an upper bound on the finite-state a-dimension of S and prove the dual fact that 1 - div(S||a)/c is an upper bound on the finite-state strong a-dimension of S.</dc:description><dc:date>2020</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106578</dc:source><dc:doi>10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2020.51</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106578</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:106578</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/TIN2016-80347-R</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Leibniz international proceedings in informatics 154 (2020), 51 [15 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>