000106616 001__ 106616
000106616 005__ 20210902121810.0
000106616 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1075/rcl.00059.iba
000106616 0248_ $$2sideral$$a119243
000106616 037__ $$aART-2020-119243
000106616 041__ $$aeng
000106616 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0241-9265$$aIbarretxe Antuñano, Iraide$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000106616 245__ $$aBook review: N.I. Stolova. Cognitive Linguistics and lexical change. Motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2015
000106616 260__ $$c2020
000106616 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000106616 5203_ $$aThis book studies the semantic evolution of translocativemotion verbs fromLatin to Romance from a historical cognitive linguistics perspective. It is divided into ten chapters plus references and two indexes, one for language and language families and another for subjects and terms. It has two main goals: (i) to apply cognitive linguisticsmethodologies and theoretical tools (mainly, lexicalisation patterns and conceptual metaphor) to explain the onomasiological (Chapters 2–4) and semasiological (Chapters 5–7) evolution of motion verbs, and (ii) to bring useful insights from (Romance) historical linguistic practice into cognitive linguistic research (Chapters 8–9).
Chapter 1 outlines the main goals, explains key concepts (motion verb, lexical change), and contextualises the research to follow. This investigation examines how the structural and semantic characteristics of Latin motion verbs diachronically develop into Romance from both a general Pan-Romance stance as well as a language-specific level. Ten categories of translocative motion are examined: one general motion (neutral GO), six path-related (TOWARD, AWAY, INSIDE, OUTSIDE, UPWARD, DOWNWARD), and three manner-related (WALK, RUN, JUMP). Data mainly come from ten languages...
000106616 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/Psylex H11-17R$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO-FEDER/FFI2017-82460-P
000106616 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000106616 590__ $$a0.405$$b2020
000106616 591__ $$aLINGUISTICS$$b162 / 193 = 0.839$$c2020$$dQ4$$eT3
000106616 592__ $$a0.253$$b2020
000106616 593__ $$aDevelopmental and Educational Psychology$$c2020$$dQ2
000106616 593__ $$aLinguistics and Language$$c2020$$dQ2
000106616 593__ $$aLanguage and Linguistics$$c2020$$dQ2
000106616 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/other$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000106616 7102_ $$13013$$2575$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Lingüíst.y Liter.Hispán.$$cÁrea Lingüística General
000106616 773__ $$g18, 1 (2020), 275-281$$pReview of cognitive linguistics$$tReview of cognitive linguistics$$x1877-9751
000106616 8564_ $$s647626$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106616/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000106616 8564_ $$s1649451$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106616/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000106616 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:106616$$particulos$$pdriver
000106616 951__ $$a2021-09-02-10:00:12
000106616 980__ $$aARTICLE