000106620 001__ 106620
000106620 005__ 20230519145355.0
000106620 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104922
000106620 0248_ $$2sideral$$a119077
000106620 037__ $$aART-2021-119077
000106620 041__ $$aeng
000106620 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3284-6065$$aSanz-Hernández, Alexia$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000106620 245__ $$aPrivately owned forests and woodlands in Spain: Changing resilience strategies towards a forest-based bioeconomy
000106620 260__ $$c2021
000106620 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000106620 5203_ $$aSome marginalized Spanish forest areas view the circular bioeconomy proposal as an alternative solution and an opportunity required by both global and local challenges. This article aims to contribute to decision-making and to a forest-bioeconomy proposal design from a qualitative perspective by analysing resilience strategies in the south of the aragonese region on three levels, namely private forest owners (PFO) practices, resources/assets, and governance, and three scales, forest, community and territory. The literature review on a resilience thinking approach and stakeholders’ perceptions have contributed to the design of a resilience strategic framework (RSF) as an analytical tool for measuring the possibilities of substantial change in the socio-ecosystem with associated attributes in five resilience strategic areas. The study concludes that PFO current strategies (persistence and safeguarding) do not suffice alone to create a territorial policy plan and change scenarios. New attributes based on adaptation, creation and transformation towards rural recapitalisation are required. The change would target increasing interdependence (between sectors, stakeholders and territories), improving capabilities in the context and increasing stakeholder and community control. This would involve overcoming current barriers and designing ‘resilience governance’ based on integration, innovation and future orientation to rural transformation.
000106620 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S33-17R
000106620 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000106620 590__ $$a6.189$$b2021
000106620 592__ $$a1.635$$b2021
000106620 594__ $$a9.9$$b2021
000106620 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES$$b24 / 128 = 0.188$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000106620 593__ $$aForestry$$c2021$$dQ1
000106620 593__ $$aNature and Landscape Conservation$$c2021$$dQ1
000106620 593__ $$aGeography, Planning and Development$$c2021$$dQ1
000106620 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000106620 7102_ $$14009$$2775$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Sociología
000106620 773__ $$g100 (2021), 104922 1-13$$pLand use policy$$tLAND USE POLICY$$x0264-8377
000106620 8564_ $$s2619094$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106620/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000106620 8564_ $$s1476864$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106620/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000106620 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:106620$$particulos$$pdriver
000106620 951__ $$a2023-05-18-13:31:01
000106620 980__ $$aARTICLE