000106661 001__ 106661
000106661 005__ 20230519145417.0
000106661 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/ijerph18168251
000106661 0248_ $$2sideral$$a124679
000106661 037__ $$aART-2021-124679
000106661 041__ $$aeng
000106661 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-7293-318X$$aOsma, Jorge$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000106661 245__ $$aValidity evidence of the multidimensional emotional disorders inventory among non-clinical spanish university students
000106661 260__ $$c2021
000106661 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000106661 5203_ $$aThe current diagnostic systems for mental health disorders are categorical, which, it has been argued, poorly reflect the reality of mental health problems. This is especially relevant in emotional disorders (EDs), especially due to the existing comorbidity between supposedly different disorders. To address this, Brown and Barlow developed a hybrid dimensional−categorical approach to EDs that can be evaluated with the Multidimensional Emotional Disorder Inventory (MEDI), a transdiagnostic self-report questionnaire. This study aims to adapt and explore the sources of validity evidence of the MEDI in a non-clinical sample of Spanish university students (n = 455). Two confirmatory analyses were performed: one with a four-dimensional structure obtained with an exploratory analysis and another with the original nine-dimensional structure of the MEDI. The latter obtained a better fit. The descriptive data, including percentiles, T-scores, and sex differences in total scores are also provided, together with sources of validity evidence. These revealed significant moderate interrelations between factors and with related measures (e.g., personality, depression, and anxiety). This study adapted the MEDI for use in Spanish, provides further support about its factor structure, and offers novel data about its validity sources. The MEDI makes the evaluation of dimensional and transdiagnostic models easier, which might be fundamental in present and future research and clinical practice.
000106661 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S31-20D$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII-FEDER/PI20-00697
000106661 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000106661 590__ $$a4.614$$b2021
000106661 592__ $$a0.814$$b2021
000106661 594__ $$a4.5$$b2021
000106661 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b45 / 183 = 0.246$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000106661 593__ $$aPollution$$c2021$$dQ1
000106661 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b71 / 210 = 0.338$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000106661 593__ $$aHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis$$c2021$$dQ1
000106661 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES$$b100 / 279 = 0.358$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000106661 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000106661 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0403-5273$$aMartínez-Loredo, V.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000106661 700__ $$aQuilez-Orden, A.
000106661 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-2437-1207$$aPeris-Baquero, Ó.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000106661 700__ $$aSuso-Ribera, C.
000106661 7102_ $$14009$$2740$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicología Social
000106661 7102_ $$14009$$2680$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló.
000106661 773__ $$g18, 16 (2021), 8251 [17 pp.]$$pInt. j. environ. res. public health$$tInternational journal of environmental research and public health$$x1661-7827
000106661 8564_ $$s691717$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106661/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000106661 8564_ $$s2841046$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106661/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000106661 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:106661$$particulos$$pdriver
000106661 951__ $$a2023-05-18-14:01:55
000106661 980__ $$aARTICLE