The Detection of Active Sinkholes by Airborne Differential LiDAR DEMs and InSAR Cloud Computing Tools

Guerrero, Jesús (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Sevil, Jorge (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Desir, Gloria (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Gutiérrez, Francisco (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; García-Arnay, Ángel (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Galve, Jorge Pedro ; Reyes-Carmona, Cristina
The Detection of Active Sinkholes by Airborne Differential LiDAR DEMs and InSAR Cloud Computing Tools
Resumen: InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar) cloud computing and the subtraction of LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) DEMs (Digital Elevation Models) are innovative approaches to detect subsidence in karst areas. InSAR cloud computing allows for analyzing C-band Envisat and Sentinel S1 SAR images through web platforms to produce displacement maps of the Earth’s surface in an easy manner. The subtraction of serial LiDAR DEMs results in the same product but with a different level of accuracy and precision than InSAR maps. Here, we analyze the capability of these products to detect active sinkholes in the mantled evaporite karst of the Ebro Valley (NE Spain). We found that the capability of the displacement maps produced with open access, high-resolution airborne LiDAR DEMs was up to four times higher than InSAR displacement maps generated by the Geohazard Exploitation Platform (GEP). Differential LiDAR maps provide accurate information about the location, active sectors, maximum subsidence rate and growing trend of the most rapid and damaging sinkholes. Unfortunately, artifacts and the subsidence detection limit established at −4 cm/yr entailed important limitations in the precise mapping of the sinkhole edges and the detection of slow-moving sinkholes and small collapses. Although InSAR maps provided by GEP show a worse performance when identifying active sinkholes, in some cases they can serve as a complementary technique to overcome LiDAR limitations in urban areas.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.3390/rs13163261
Año: 2021
Publicado en: Remote Sensing 13, 16 (2021), 3261 [23 pp.]
ISSN: 2072-4292

Factor impacto JCR: 5.349 (2021)
Categ. JCR: GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY rank: 30 / 203 = 0.148 (2021) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY rank: 6 / 28 = 0.214 (2021) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: REMOTE SENSING rank: 11 / 34 = 0.324 (2021) - Q2 - T1
Categ. JCR: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES rank: 83 / 279 = 0.297 (2021) - Q2 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 7.4 - Earth and Planetary Sciences (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.283 - Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/CGL2017-85045-P
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Geodinámica Externa (Dpto. Ciencias de la Tierra)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2023-05-18-14:00:33)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos



 Registro creado el 2021-11-15, última modificación el 2023-05-19


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)