000108388 001__ 108388
000108388 005__ 20230519145430.0
000108388 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1086/716721
000108388 0248_ $$2sideral$$a124944
000108388 037__ $$aART-2021-124944
000108388 041__ $$aeng
000108388 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-9390-4022$$aCasas Cortés, M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000108388 245__ $$aPrecarious Writings. Reckoning the Absences and Reclaiming the Legacies in the Current Poetics/Politics of Precarity
000108388 260__ $$c2021
000108388 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000108388 5203_ $$aScholarly debates over precarity are gaining unprecedented visibility across fields. From labor insecurity forming a growing dangerous class to the existential condition of vulnerability induced by millennial capitalism, precarity has become an object of both empirical study and theoretical reflection. While European social movements have been organizing and writing about precarity from the late 1970s to today, still, from the US perspective, the term precarity might be mistakenly taken as strictly a scholarly invention. “Precarious Writings” offers an important corrective to the ways that precarity has been taken up in anthropology and cognate disciplines, addressing the specific epistemological and political limitations of existing usages and returning the concept to its overlooked grassroots history in social movement struggles in southern Europe. By returning precarity to these activist roots, this paper makes the case for the recognition of social movements as knowledge producers as well as sources of theoretical insight and innovation in their own right. By failing to recognize precarity’s development within contentious struggles, scholarly uses miss how the activist notion enables identity reformulations toward a kind of “precarity pride.” That is, the politicization of insecurity has become a source for nurturing a fluid space of political creation.
000108388 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/RYC-2018-024990-I
000108388 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
000108388 590__ $$a3.226$$b2021
000108388 592__ $$a0.83$$b2021
000108388 594__ $$a5.5$$b2021
000108388 591__ $$aANTHROPOLOGY$$b10 / 93 = 0.108$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000108388 593__ $$aArcheology$$c2021$$dQ1
000108388 593__ $$aAnthropology$$c2021$$dQ1
000108388 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000108388 7102_ $$14009$$2775$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Sociología
000108388 773__ $$g62, 5 (2021), 510-538$$pCurr. anthropol.$$tCURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY$$x0011-3204
000108388 8564_ $$s16488202$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/108388/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000108388 8564_ $$s2880685$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/108388/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000108388 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:108388$$particulos$$pdriver
000108388 951__ $$a2023-05-18-14:17:46
000108388 980__ $$aARTICLE