000108415 001__ 108415
000108415 005__ 20230519145456.0
000108415 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1111/arcm.12623
000108415 0248_ $$2sideral$$a121537
000108415 037__ $$aART-2021-121537
000108415 041__ $$aeng
000108415 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8321-2396$$aLapuente, P.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000108415 245__ $$aAddressing the controversial origin of the marble source used in the Phoenician anthropoid sarcophagi of Gadir (Cadiz, Spain)
000108415 260__ $$c2021
000108415 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000108415 5203_ $$aDating from the fifth century bce, two Phoenician anthropoid sarcophagi, a male and a female, found in Gadir (Cadiz, Spain), are so far the most ancient marble sculptures found in the Iberian Peninsula. The identification of the source of the marble used to produce them has been a subject of controversy for several decades and has recently resurfaced when it was published that they were made by Phoenician artisans using Iberian marble from Macael. This identification is not only unreasonable from an archaeological point of view but also unsupported by any analytical data. On the contrary, as the sarcophagi belong to an Eastern Mediterranean Sidonian production, their raw material is most likely to be Greek-Minor Asian in origin. In order to shed a light on this dispute and objectively resolve the provenance of the marble, a multi-method analytical approach was carried out. Optical microscopy, cathodoluminescence analyses, and C and O stable isotopes clarify the provenance of the marble, confirming that both singular sarcophagi were carved in a Cycladic marble, in accordance with their Sidonian style.
000108415 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/PID2019-106967GB-I00$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO-FEDER/HAR2015-65319-P
000108415 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000108415 590__ $$a1.915$$b2021
000108415 591__ $$aCHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR$$b29 / 46 = 0.63$$c2021$$dQ3$$eT2
000108415 591__ $$aGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b150 / 203 = 0.739$$c2021$$dQ3$$eT3
000108415 591__ $$aCHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL$$b69 / 87 = 0.793$$c2021$$dQ4$$eT3
000108415 594__ $$a3.5$$b2021
000108415 592__ $$a0.871$$b2021
000108415 593__ $$aHistory$$c2021$$dQ1
000108415 593__ $$aArcheology$$c2021$$dQ1
000108415 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000108415 700__ $$aRoda, I.
000108415 700__ $$aGarcia-M, A.G.
000108415 700__ $$aBrilli, M.
000108415 7102_ $$12000$$2685$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ciencias de la Tierra$$cÁrea Petrología y Geoquímica
000108415 773__ $$g63, 3 (2021), 467-480$$pArchaeometry$$tArchaeometry$$x0003-813X
000108415 8564_ $$s705458$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/108415/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000108415 8564_ $$s1308278$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/108415/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000108415 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:108415$$particulos$$pdriver
000108415 951__ $$a2023-05-18-14:50:43
000108415 980__ $$aARTICLE