000108416 001__ 108416
000108416 005__ 20211115162714.0
000108416 0248_ $$2sideral$$a121555
000108416 037__ $$aART-2020-121555
000108416 041__ $$aeng
000108416 100__ $$aDel Barco, L.
000108416 245__ $$aAnalysis of results of effective dose estimation obtained from RADAR 2017 dose assessment model for nuclear medicine procedures
000108416 260__ $$c2020
000108416 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000108416 5203_ $$aEP-296
Aim/Introduction: To analyze the results of effective dose (E) estimation of the most frequent procedures using photon emitters in Nuclear Medicine, obtained from RADAR 2017 dose assessment model. To compare these results with those obtained from ICRP 128 (2015) recommendations, and to assess how using each dose assessment model can change E results.
Materials and Methods: E estimation data was collected from photon emitter procedures performed during the last year in our department, obtained from RADAR 2017 dose estimation model for age groups: = 1 year old; >1-5 years old ; >5- 10 years old, >10- 15 years old and adults. Injected activity was the one recommended by international guidelines and EANM Pediatric and Dosimetry Committees. Hybrid exams (SPECT / CT) and procedures for which there is no RADAR 2017 dosimetry estimation were excluded. Results for (E) were compared with those obtained by using ICRP 128 (2015) recommendations.
Results: With RADAR 2017 dose evaluation model we obtained a lower mean value of E on most of the procedures that were analyzed, being significantly lower for Renogram, Renal scintigraphy on >10-15 years old, Thyroid scintigraphy, Meckel’s scan and Bone Scan (0.12 to 1.16 mSv, 25% to 67%). Brain perfusion and Renal scintigraphy on ages under 10 obtained a significantly greater difference for E (0.33 to 2.85 mSv, 26% to 29%).
Conclusion: These results are an updated collection of estimated E values for photon-emitting radiopharmaceuticals commonly used in Nuclear Medicine, considering RADAR 2017 dose assessment model compared to ICRP 128) recommendations. Methodological changes on estimation lead to lower E for most of diagnostic procedures using photon emitters, this is of special interest for patients undergoing repeated ionizing radiation (dosimetry history).
000108416 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000108416 590__ $$a9.236$$b2020
000108416 591__ $$aRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING$$b5 / 134 = 0.037$$c2020$$dQ1$$eT1
000108416 592__ $$a2.313$$b2020
000108416 593__ $$aRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging$$c2020$$dQ1
000108416 593__ $$aMedicine (miscellaneous)$$c2020$$dQ1
000108416 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000108416 700__ $$aCalderon Calvente, M.
000108416 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0962-7689$$ade la Cueva Barrao, L.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000108416 700__ $$aGandia Martinez, A.
000108416 700__ $$aMonux Salvador, S.
000108416 700__ $$aGuzman Prudencio, G.
000108416 700__ $$aNieto Morcillo, L.
000108416 700__ $$aFalgas Lacueva, M.
000108416 700__ $$aNavarro Beltran, P.
000108416 700__ $$aAlvarez Ruiz, S.
000108416 700__ $$aSangros Sahun, M.
000108416 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-5512-5885$$aAbos Olivares, D.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000108416 7102_ $$11011$$2770$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Microb.Ped.Radio.Sal.Pú.$$cÁrea Radiol. y Medicina Física
000108416 773__ $$g47, SUPPL 1 (2020), S654-S655$$pEur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging$$tEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING$$x1619-7070
000108416 85641 $$uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00259-020-04988-4.pdf$$zTexto completo de la revista
000108416 8564_ $$s170400$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/108416/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000108416 8564_ $$s2888974$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/108416/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000108416 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:108416$$particulos$$pdriver
000108416 951__ $$a2021-11-15-12:20:19
000108416 980__ $$aARTICLE