000108435 001__ 108435
000108435 005__ 20230519145509.0
000108435 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/ijerph182111249
000108435 0248_ $$2sideral$$a125003
000108435 037__ $$aART-2021-125003
000108435 041__ $$aeng
000108435 100__ $$aChisbert-Alapont, E.
000108435 245__ $$aInfluence of palliative care training on nurses’ attitudes towards end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain
000108435 260__ $$c2021
000108435 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000108435 5203_ $$aAim: This study aims to assess the influence of training on nurses’ attitudes toward end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic alarm state in Spain. Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Data collection was carried out by means of an ad hoc questionnaire using Google Forms in April and May 2020. The score of attitudes toward end-of-life care was used, to which sociodemographic variables and training in palliative care were added. Methods: Data were collected from 238 nursing professionals who had cared for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 adult patients at the end-of-life stage in a hospital or nursing home. Results: Results showed that 51% of the nurses in the sample had training in palliative care. However, the percentage decreased to 38.5% among those who cared for COVID-19 patients and to 44.5% in those who cared for non-COVID-19 patients. In relation to attitudes about end-of-life care, more positive attitudes and a higher mean score were found in the trained group. Conclusions: Palliative care training is a key element in end-of-life care and is even more important in times of COVID-19. Impact: Although end-of-life accompaniment has been studied, few studies have included the influence of training on this during the pandemic. This study identifies key elements of accompaniment and training in a comparison of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. In relation to attitudes toward end-of-life care, the results showed a more positive attitude and a higher mean score in the trained group (3.43 ± 0.37 versus 3.21 ± 0.32), the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001).
000108435 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000108435 590__ $$a4.614$$b2021
000108435 592__ $$a0.814$$b2021
000108435 594__ $$a4.5$$b2021
000108435 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b45 / 183 = 0.246$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000108435 593__ $$aPollution$$c2021$$dQ1
000108435 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b71 / 210 = 0.338$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000108435 593__ $$aHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis$$c2021$$dQ1
000108435 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES$$b100 / 279 = 0.358$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000108435 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000108435 700__ $$aGarcía-Salvador, I.
000108435 700__ $$aOssa-Sendra, M.J. de la
000108435 700__ $$aGarcía-Navarro, E.B.
000108435 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3472-5216$$aRica Escuin, M.L. de la$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000108435 7102_ $$11006$$2255$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Enfermería
000108435 773__ $$g18, 21 (2021), 11249[13 pp.]$$pInt. j. environ. res. public health$$tInternational journal of environmental research and public health$$x1661-7827
000108435 8564_ $$s391195$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/108435/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000108435 8564_ $$s2820060$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/108435/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000108435 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:108435$$particulos$$pdriver
000108435 951__ $$a2023-05-18-15:09:44
000108435 980__ $$aARTICLE