Power to gas-electrochemical industry hybrid systems: A case study
Resumen: Several researchers have proposed in literature different Power to Gas (PtG) hybridizations to improve the efficiency of this energy storage technology. Some of the synergies of this hybrid systems are already being tested under real conditions (e.g. PtG-Amine scrubbing, PtG-wastewater treatment) while others have only been studied through numerical simulations (e.g., PtG-oxyfuel combustion). Here, a novel hybridization between Power to Gas and electrochemical industries is proposed for the first time. This PtG-Electrochemical hybridization avoids to implement the typical water electrolysis stage of PtG since hydrogen is already available in the plant. This study thoroughly analyzes the implementation of Power to Gas in a real electrochemical plant that sub-produces hydrogen from the lines of production of chlorate, chlorine, and potassium hydroxide. It is shown that the required carbon dioxide for methanation can be captured from the flue gas of the factory''s boilers without additional energy penalty thanks to energy integration. The methanation plant has been designed according to the H2 and CO2 availability, taking into account the number of operating hours and the degree of usage of by-products. Results show that this PtG hybridization could operate more than 6000 h per year at large scale concepts (nominal H2 inputs of 2000 m3/h (NTP)), which represents 2000 h more than pilot/commercial demonstrations of classic PtG concepts. Besides, a detailed economic analysis demonstrates the economic feasibility of the system under current scenarios. It is shown that the capital investment would be recovered in 8 years, generating a 4.8 M€ NPV at the end of the project lifetime. Thus, this work presents a suitable way to avoid the subsidy dependency that current PtG research projects have.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.177
Año: 2017
Publicado en: Applied Energy 202 (2017), 435-446
ISSN: 0306-2619

Factor impacto JCR: 7.9 (2017)
Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL rank: 4 / 137 = 0.029 (2017) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: ENERGY & FUELS rank: 8 / 97 = 0.082 (2017) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 3.162 - Building and Construction (Q1) - Civil and Structural Engineering (Q1) - Energy (miscellaneous) (Q1) - Nuclear Energy and Engineering (Q1) - Fuel Technology (Q1) - Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (Q1) - Mechanical Engineering (Q1) - Energy Engineering and Power Technology (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Artículo (PrePrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Máquinas y Motores Térmi. (Dpto. Ingeniería Mecánica)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2021-11-25-11:08:43)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos



 Registro creado el 2021-11-25, última modificación el 2021-11-25


Preprint:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)