Reduction of ammonia emissions from laying hen manure in a closed composting process using gas-permeable membrane technology
Resumen: Nitrogen losses during composting processes lead to emissions problems and reduce the compost fertilizer value. Gas-permeable membranes (GPM) are a promising approach to address the challenge of reducing nitrogen losses in composting processes. This study investigated the applicability of two GPM membrane systems to recover N released during the closed composting process of laying hen manure. The ammonia (NH3) capture process was performed using two different systems over a period of 44 days: the first system (S1) consisted of 120 m of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane installed inside a 3.7 m3 portable, closed aerobic composter with forced ventilation; the second system (S2) consisted of 474 m of an ePTFE membrane placed inside as an external module designed for NH3 capture, connected to a closed aerobic composter through a pipe. In both cases, a 1 N H2SO4 acidic NH3 capture solution was circulated inside the membranes at a flow rate of 2.1 L·h−1. The amount of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) recovered was similar in the two systems (0.61 kg in S1 and 0.65 kg in S2) due to the chosen membrane surface areas, but the TAN recovery rate was six times higher in system S1 (6.9 g TAN·m−2·day−1) than in system S2 (1.9 g TAN·m−2·day−1) due to the presence of a higher NH3 concentration in the air in contact with the membrane. Given that the NH3 concentration in the atmosphere of the membrane compartment directly influences the NH3 capture, better performance of the GPM recovery system may be attained by installing it directly inside the closed aerobic composters. Regardless of the chosen configuration, this technology allows N recovery as a stable and concentrated 1.4% N ammonium salt solution, which can be used for fertigation. The presented GPM systems may be used in community composting systems with low volumes of waste to be treated or in livestock facilities that have implemented best available techniques such as solid–liquid separation or anaerobic digestion, provided that the use of GPM technology in combination with these techniques also contributes to odor mitigation and improves biogas yields
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11122384
Año: 2021
Publicado en: Agronomy 11, 12 (2021), 2384 [22 pp.]
ISSN: 2073-4395

Factor impacto JCR: 3.949 (2021)
Categ. JCR: PLANT SCIENCES rank: 55 / 240 = 0.229 (2021) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: AGRONOMY rank: 18 / 90 = 0.2 (2021) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 3.9 - Agricultural and Biological Sciences (Q2)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.654 - Agronomy and Crop Science (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EUR/LIFE/15 ENV/ES/000284
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Area Ingeniería Agroforestal (Dpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2023-05-18-14:08:57)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos por área > Ingeniería Agroforestal



 Registro creado el 2021-12-20, última modificación el 2023-05-19


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)