<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742438</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Garcia Campayo, Javier</dc:creator><dc:creator>Moyano, Nieves</dc:creator><dc:creator>Modrego Alarcón, Marta</dc:creator><dc:creator>Herrera Mercadal, Paola</dc:creator><dc:creator>Puebla Guedea, Marta</dc:creator><dc:creator>Campos, Daniel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gascón, Santiago</dc:creator><dc:title>Validation of the Spanish version of the lucidity and consciousness in dreams scale</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2021-126042</dc:identifier><dc:description>Lucid dreaming, a specific phenomenon of dream consciousness, refers to the experience being aware that one is dreaming. The primary aim of this research was to validate a Spanish version of the Lucidity and Consciousness in Dreams scale (LuCiD). A secondary aim was to explore whether meditation experience and mindfulness trait were related to LuCiD scores. Data from 367 Spanish men (34.6%) and women (65.4%) who completed LuCiD, the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) were examined. From the total sample, 40.3% indicated some experience with formal meditation (meditators), while 59.7% did not have any meditation experience (non-meditators). A random subsample of 101 participants, who completed LuCiD for a second time after a period of 10-15days, was used for test-retest reliability analysis. The LuCiD scale comprises 28 items distributed across eight factors: insight, control, thought, realism, memory, dissociation, negative emotion, and positive emotion. Factor structure, reliability by both internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and construct and concurrent validity were tested. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the original eight-factor model, showing goodness of fit in contrast to a single-factor model. Item 15 was deleted from the Dissociation factor as it performed poorly (i.e., skewness and kurtosis, non-normal distribution of responses, and corrected item-total correlation under 0.40). The scale showed adequate values of internal consistency (between alpha=0.65 for Memory and alpha=0.83 for Positive Emotion) and test-retest reliability by significant Pearson correlations (p &lt; 0.001) for each factor. The scores of meditators were higher for the LuCiD scale Insight and Dissociation factors, in contrast to those of non-meditators. The Observing facet of mindfulness was positively associated with all LuCiD factors, except Realism and Positive Emotion, and the Acting with Awareness facet showed a negative correlation with the LuCiD factor Realism. Finally, positive and negative affects was associated with the LuCiD factors Positive Emotion and Negative Emotion. This study provides a valid and reliable measure for exploring lucidity and consciousness in dreams for a Spanish population, Moreover, the results suggest a relationship with meditation experience, mindfulness trait, and positive and negative affect.</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/109632</dc:source><dc:doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742438</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/109632</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:109632</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021), 742438 [12 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>