000109657 001__ 109657 000109657 005__ 20240319080948.0 000109657 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106373 000109657 0248_ $$2sideral$$a127588 000109657 037__ $$aART-2022-127588 000109657 041__ $$aeng 000109657 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0100-1449$$aLozano-Blasco, Raquel$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000109657 245__ $$aScreen addicts: A meta-analysis of internet addiction in adolescence 000109657 260__ $$c2022 000109657 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted 000109657 5203_ $$aCurrently, the incidence of Internet addiction is growing among teenagers. However, most review studies do not differentiate between the adolescent and young adult population. The sample of this meta-analysis consists of 20 studies (K = 28) comprised of 21 878 adolescents whose mean age was 15.13 years. Regarding the methodology, the protocol of registration of the research of the Cochrane systematic review manuals in Higgins and Green (2011) and PRISMA (2015) was followed. The results show a high heterogeneity. Thus, the Random Effects Model has been necessary followed. The effect size of the Internet addiction is Z = 16.04; p = 0.000 with a 95% confidence interval (3.164 – 4.045). In other words, the population does not suffer from severe Internet addiction, although the incidence is still alarming. Moderator variables, such as age, explained 24% of variance; instrument explained 31% of variance, in particular CIAS (Z = 1.75; p = 0.07) and IGD-20 (Z = 4.53; p = 0.00); and finally culture explained 47%, and more concretely, the international sample (Z = -1.71; p = 0.00). Thus, Internet addiction is inversely proportional to age and is influenced by the geographical area in which one resides. On the other hand, it should be noted that there is no agreement on the diagnosis of Internet addiction or on the instruments used to measure it. It is necessary to build an explanatory and intervention model for this pathology based on an international framework. The absence of clear criteria has generated multiple psychometric instruments around which there is no solid consensus. Finally, a complex etiology is presented in which educational, socio-familial, cultural and individual variables are involved. 000109657 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S57-20R 000109657 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ 000109657 590__ $$a3.3$$b2022 000109657 592__ $$a0.974$$b2022 000109657 591__ $$aSOCIAL WORK$$b4 / 44 = 0.091$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1 000109657 593__ $$aEducation$$c2022$$dQ1 000109657 591__ $$aFAMILY STUDIES$$b10 / 46 = 0.217$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1 000109657 593__ $$aSociology and Political Science$$c2022$$dQ1 000109657 593__ $$aSocial Work$$c2022$$dQ1 000109657 593__ $$aDevelopmental and Educational Psychology$$c2022$$dQ2 000109657 594__ $$a5.0$$b2022 000109657 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 000109657 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8486-6885$$aLatorre-Martínez, MªPilar$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000109657 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-2839-7041$$aCortés-Pascual, Alejandra$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000109657 7102_ $$14012$$2650$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Direcc.Organiza.Empresas$$cÁrea Organización de Empresas 000109657 7102_ $$14009$$2735$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicolog.Evolut.Educac 000109657 7102_ $$14001$$2625$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ciencias de la Educación$$cÁrea Métod.Invest.Diag.Educac. 000109657 773__ $$g135 (2022), 106373 [11 pp]$$pChild. youth serv. rev.$$tChildren and Youth Services Review$$x0190-7409 000109657 8564_ $$s2379074$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/109657/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada 000109657 8564_ $$s2654354$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/109657/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada 000109657 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:109657$$particulos$$pdriver 000109657 951__ $$a2024-03-18-12:49:22 000109657 980__ $$aARTICLE