000110764 001__ 110764
000110764 005__ 20230519145407.0
000110764 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s11104-021-04866-4
000110764 0248_ $$2sideral$$a123313
000110764 037__ $$aART-2021-123313
000110764 041__ $$aeng
000110764 100__ $$aSánchez-Martín, R.
000110764 245__ $$aPlant’s gypsum affinity shapes responses to specific edaphic constraints without limiting responses to other general constraints
000110764 260__ $$c2021
000110764 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000110764 5203_ $$aAims: Harsh edaphic environments harbor species with different soil affinities. Plant’s responses to specific edaphic constraints may be compromised against responses to prevalent stresses shared with other semi-arid environments. We expect that species with high edaphic affinity may show traits to overcome harsh soil properties, while species with low affinity may respond to environmental constraints shared with arid environments. Methods: We quantified the edaphic affinity of 12 plant species co-occurring in gypsum outcrops and measured traits related to plant responses to specific gypsum constraints (rooting and water uptake depth, foliar accumulation of Ca, S and Mg), and traits related to common constraints of arid environments (water use efficiency, macronutrients foliar content). Results: Plants in gypsum outcrops differed in their strategies to face edaphic limitations. A phylogenetic informed PCA segregated species based on their foliar Ca and S accumulation and greater water uptake depths, associated with plant responses to specific gypsum limitations. Species’ gypsum affinity explained this segregation, but traits related to water or nutrient use efficiency did not contribute substantially to this axis. Conclusions: Plant’s specializations to respond to specific edaphic constraints of gypsum soils do not limit their ability to deal with other non-specific environmental constraints.
000110764 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/H09-20R$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU-FEDER/CGL2013-48753-R$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU-FEDER/RTI2018-099672-J-I00
000110764 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000110764 590__ $$a4.993$$b2021
000110764 592__ $$a1.123$$b2021
000110764 594__ $$a7.3$$b2021
000110764 591__ $$aAGRONOMY$$b13 / 90 = 0.144$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000110764 593__ $$aSoil Science$$c2021$$dQ1
000110764 591__ $$aPLANT SCIENCES$$b35 / 240 = 0.146$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000110764 593__ $$aPlant Science$$c2021$$dQ1
000110764 591__ $$aSOIL SCIENCE$$b11 / 39 = 0.282$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT1
000110764 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000110764 700__ $$aQuerejeta, J.I.
000110764 700__ $$aVoltas, J.
000110764 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-5904-7821$$aFerrio, J.P.
000110764 700__ $$aPrieto, I.
000110764 700__ $$aVerdú, M.
000110764 700__ $$aMontesinos-Navarro, A.
000110764 773__ $$g462 (2021), 297–309$$pPlant soil$$tPLANT AND SOIL$$x0032-079X
000110764 8564_ $$s372772$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/110764/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000110764 8564_ $$s1817789$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/110764/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000110764 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:110764$$particulos$$pdriver
000110764 951__ $$a2023-05-18-13:50:49
000110764 980__ $$aARTICLE