111630 20230519145550.0 doi 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa255 sideral 126553 ART-2021-126553 eng Díaz García A. Universidad de Zaragoza (orcid)0000-0003-4398-4014 Theoretical adequacy, methodological quality and efficacy of online interventions targeting resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2021 Access copy available to the general public Unrestricted BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in the promotion of mental health, and concepts as resilience are re-emerging and taking relevance. In addition, Information and Communication Technologies can provide potential benefits in the field of mental health, and the treatment of mental disorders in particular. This study aims to synthesize the evidence of internet-based resilience interventions, analyzing the theoretical adequacy, methodological quality and efficacy. METHODS: A systematic search was performed. The eligibility criteria stated for this article were: randomized controlled trials targeted at adults or adolescents and including any psychological intervention focussing on resilience in its rationale or design. Studies with direct (e.g. resilience scales) and proximal resilience measures (e.g. scales on well-being) were included. Risk of bias was assessed for each trial using Cochrane''s Collaboration Tool. Two reviewers worked independently in order to identify potential articles. A total of 11 articles were selected. A random-effects pooling model using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method based on direct and proximal resilience measures at post-test was used. RESULTS: The overall effects of online resilience training compared to control groups at post-test were not significant; the effect size concerning the improvement of resilience was g=0.12 (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.38). In addition, a potential association between the type of outcome and the effect size could be revealed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present meta-analysis showed that the overall effect of online resilience trainings was not significant. Nonetheless, a tendency for a higher benefit for resilience was found in the studies with a clear assessment theory, indicating some promising effects. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42018083339. © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/FPI-MINECO/BES-2015-072360 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/634757/EU/Integrating Technology into Mental Health Care Delivery in Europe/ICare This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No H2020 634757-ICare info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/PSI2014-54172-R info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess by http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ 4.424 2021 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 77 / 210 = 0.367 2021 Q2 T2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 49 / 183 = 0.268 2021 Q2 T1 0.982 2021 Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2021 Q1 4.6 2021 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Franke M. Herrero R. Universidad de Zaragoza (orcid)0000-0001-6987-6607 Ebert D.D. Botella C. 4009 680 Universidad de Zaragoza Dpto. Psicología y Sociología Área Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló. 31, Supp. I (2021), 11-18 Eur. j. public health European Journal of Public Health 1101-1262 408357 http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/111630/files/texto_completo.pdf Versión publicada 3435208 http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/111630/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon icon Versión publicada oai:zaguan.unizar.es:111630 articulos driver 2023-05-18-15:49:14 ARTICLE