000112055 001__ 112055
000112055 005__ 20240319080951.0
000112055 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/diagnostics12020546
000112055 0248_ $$2sideral$$a127805
000112055 037__ $$aART-2022-127805
000112055 041__ $$aeng
000112055 100__ $$aLeonet Tijero, Leire
000112055 245__ $$aInterexaminer reliability and validity of quantity of cervical mobility during online dynamic inspection
000112055 260__ $$c2022
000112055 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000112055 5203_ $$aPhysical therapists routinely measure range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine. The reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device has been demonstrated in several studies, but current evidence on the validity and reliability of the visual inspection is contradictory. The aim is to assess the validity and interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection of active cervical ROM in physiotherapy students. Methods: Flexion, extension, both lateral flexions and rotations of a single participant were measured using CROM. Online visual inspection of 18 physiotherapy students against CROM was registered. Results: The validity, against CROM, of the online visual inspection of the active ROM ranged from good to excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 0.83–0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection had favorable
outcomes in all cervical movements in the three physiotherapy courses (ICC 0.70–0.96), with the visual inspection of the rotations being the most reliable (ICC 0.93–0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the classification of mobility was poor to good (Kappa 0.03–0.90). Conclusions: The interexaminer reliability and validity of the quantification of active cervical movement during online visual inspection was shown to be good to excellent for flexion-extension and lateral flexions and excellent for rotations.
000112055 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000112055 590__ $$a3.6$$b2022
000112055 592__ $$a0.67$$b2022
000112055 591__ $$aMEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL$$b64 / 169 = 0.379$$c2022$$dQ2$$eT2
000112055 593__ $$aClinical Biochemistry$$c2022$$dQ2
000112055 594__ $$a3.6$$b2022
000112055 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000112055 700__ $$aCorral De Toro, Jaime
000112055 700__ $$aRodríguez Sanz, Jacobo
000112055 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-9678-3449$$aHernández Secorún, Mar$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000112055 700__ $$aAbenia Benedí, Hugo
000112055 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9930-3903$$aLucha López, María Orosia$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000112055 700__ $$aMonti Ballano, Sofía$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000112055 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9105-827X$$aMüller-Thyssen Uriarte, Julián$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000112055 700__ $$aTricás Vidal, Héctor
000112055 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-7667-2178$$aHidalgo-García, César$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000112055 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3583-5206$$aTricás Moreno, José Miguel$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000112055 7102_ $$11006$$2413$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Fisioterapia
000112055 773__ $$g12, 546 (2022), 11$$tDiagnostics$$x2075-4418
000112055 8564_ $$s888772$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/112055/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000112055 8564_ $$s2745729$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/112055/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000112055 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:112055$$particulos$$pdriver
000112055 951__ $$a2024-03-18-13:06:35
000112055 980__ $$aARTICLE