<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.52768/2766-7820/1599</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Gregorio, Miguel Ángel de</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bernal, Roman</dc:creator><dc:creator>Serrano Casorran, C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bonastre, C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Guirola, Jose Andres</dc:creator><dc:title>Cavography with hydrogen peroxide. Accidental injection of hydrogen peroxide into the inferior vena cava</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2022-127918</dc:identifier><dc:description>Contrast cavography during removal of a vena cava filter in pa- tients treated via thrombectomy for pulmonary embolism is a widely performed procedure, which may involve potentially serious com- plications if the human factor fails. Accidental injection of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) after mistaking it for contrast material can have fatal consequences. We present the case of a patient who was acciden- tally injected with a high quantity of hydrogen peroxide. The prepa- ration of a preoperative checklist, the amount of H202 injected and the operator’s skill in aspirating the substance are decisive factors in avoiding such complications.</dc:description><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/112089</dc:source><dc:doi>10.52768/2766-7820/1599</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/112089</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:112089</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Journal of Clinical Images and Medical Case Reports 3, 1 (2022), 1599-1602</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>