000112409 001__ 112409
000112409 005__ 20230914083436.0
000112409 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.17583/rimcis.9560
000112409 0248_ $$2sideral$$a128274
000112409 037__ $$aART-2022-128274
000112409 041__ $$aeng
000112409 100__ $$aValls, Rosa
000112409 245__ $$aPromoting Admiration of Foucault Hiding his Defense of Rape and Pederasty
000112409 260__ $$c2022
000112409 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000112409 5203_ $$aFoucault has been quoted as a great intellectual contributor to feminism and education, despite his defense of decriminalizing rape and pederasty. Since the MeToo movement, there is an increasing criticism of Foucault’s persona and works. However, in order to avoid recognizing their mistake, some authors say that Foucault’s defense of sexual violence was unknown before. This article shows this is not backed by evidence. Data was collected via interviews with 19 subjects with diverse profiles, employing the communicative methodology. The results shed light on the fact that some professors who have included Foucault’s works in their classes hid Foucault’s position in favor of sexual violence to their students. Interviewees state that there are several reasons why they think those professors hid this fact: a) the most critical thinker; b) the transgressor; c) a relativist intellectual; d) “a shield to hide behind”; and e) the idea that the intellectual must be separated from the person. This study indicates that in transmitting those images and hiding or even justifying Foucault instead of critically analyzing the implication of his works and his defense of sexual violence, perpetuating its justification, such professors act as his “hooligans”.
000112409 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000112409 592__ $$a0.53$$b2022
000112409 593__ $$aHistory$$c2022$$dQ1
000112409 593__ $$aPhilosophy$$c2022$$dQ1
000112409 593__ $$aSocial Sciences (miscellaneous)$$c2022$$dQ2
000112409 593__ $$aEconomics and Econometrics$$c2022$$dQ2
000112409 594__ $$a3.8$$b2022
000112409 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000112409 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0937-4861$$aElboj, Carmen$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000112409 700__ $$aSerradell, Olga
000112409 700__ $$aDíez-Palomar, Javier
000112409 700__ $$aAiello, Emilia
000112409 700__ $$aRacionero, Sandra
000112409 700__ $$aVidu, Ana
000112409 700__ $$aRoca, Esther
000112409 700__ $$aJoanpere, Mar
000112409 700__ $$aLópez de Aguileta, Ane
000112409 7102_ $$14009$$2775$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Sociología
000112409 773__ $$g11, 1 (2022), 1-26$$pRIMCIS$$tRIMCIS$$x2014-3680
000112409 8564_ $$s385610$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/112409/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000112409 8564_ $$s1120546$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/112409/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000112409 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:112409$$particulos$$pdriver
000112409 951__ $$a2023-09-13-12:17:50
000112409 980__ $$aARTICLE