000112462 001__ 112462 000112462 005__ 20240319080956.0 000112462 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120273 000112462 0248_ $$2sideral$$a128532 000112462 037__ $$aART-2022-128532 000112462 041__ $$aeng 000112462 100__ $$aLecegui, A. 000112462 245__ $$aDisentangling the role of management practices on ecosystem services delivery in Mediterranean silvopastoral systems: Synergies and trade-offs through expert-based assessment 000112462 260__ $$c2022 000112462 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted 000112462 5203_ $$aSilvopastoral systems (SPS) emerge with a renewal interest in the Mediterranean for their promotion of multifunctionality through a variety of ecosystem services (ES). However, the understanding of how combined forestry and pastoral practices affect the ES delivery as well as the synergies and trade-off dynamics amongst them is still very limited. We applied the structured expert consultation Delphi method to assess the medium-term effect of relevant silvopastoral management practices (SMP) on the delivery of provision, regulation and maintenance and cultural ES in Mediterranean mid-mountain SPS in Spain. The deliberation process entailed two rounds and the Delphi panel was finally formed by 69 experts covering a broad spectrum of background and expertise. Results show that some practices, such as silvicultural treatments (e.g., thinning or coppice selection), play a multifunctional role contributing to ES delivery in bundles while some trade-offs are also identified between SMP, such as free animal grazing, and the provision of some ES. Synergies are also found between ES, such as livestock production and recreational hunting and between timber production and carbon sequestration, whereas possible trade-offs were particularly relevant between wildfire prevention and carbon sequestration. These findings can support decision-making processes towards sustainable and multifunctional silvopastoral management in the northern Mediterranean basin. 000112462 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/INIA/RTA2017-00036-C01-02$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/PRE2018-084779 000112462 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/ 000112462 590__ $$a3.7$$b2022 000112462 592__ $$a1.184$$b2022 000112462 591__ $$aFORESTRY$$b8 / 69 = 0.116$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1 000112462 593__ $$aForestry$$c2022$$dQ1 000112462 593__ $$aNature and Landscape Conservation$$c2022$$dQ1 000112462 593__ $$aManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law$$c2022$$dQ1 000112462 594__ $$a7.2$$b2022 000112462 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 000112462 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3817-1679$$aOlaizola, A. M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000112462 700__ $$aVarela, E. 000112462 7102_ $$15011$$2235$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural$$cÁrea Econom.Sociol.Polit.Agra. 000112462 773__ $$g517 (2022), 120273 [12 pp.]$$pFor. ecol. manag.$$tForest Ecology and Management$$x0378-1127 000112462 8564_ $$s3047443$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/112462/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada 000112462 8564_ $$s2658741$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/112462/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada 000112462 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:112462$$particulos$$pdriver 000112462 951__ $$a2024-03-18-13:40:36 000112462 980__ $$aARTICLE