000117139 001__ 117139
000117139 005__ 20240319080953.0
000117139 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1177/16094069211064668
000117139 0248_ $$2sideral$$a128197
000117139 037__ $$aART-2022-128197
000117139 041__ $$aeng
000117139 100__ $$aMunte-Pascual, Ariadna
000117139 245__ $$aSocial Impact Indicators in the Context of the Roma Community: Contributions to the Debate on Methodological Implications
000117139 260__ $$c2022
000117139 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000117139 5203_ $$aResearching with methodologies focused on social impact in line with the SDGs is one of the priority orientations of the Horizon Europe program, as shown in the official European Commission document on impacts for this program. In this sense, researchers must forecast how their project will improve citizens'' lives. Until now, many investigations showed the evaluation of the social impact through knowledge transfer activities that, although undoubtedly important, are not enough since the social impact is defined as the improvements derived from using the knowledge transferred to society. The search for the social impact of new research requires the introduction of impact indicators from the design, throughout the project development, and when the project ends. The introduction of indicators, in particular if they are decided in dialogue with the participants, allows not only to foresee a greater social impact but also to improve and adjust the methodology to be used. We explore this aspect in the context of research with social impact that starts from how the COVID-19 pandemic is increasing the inequalities suffered by the Roma population, causing the aggravation and creation of new problems and needs. Thus, we explain in detail how the selection of indicators that monitor the social impact, in dialogue with the Roma population, allows the design of research projects that are more appropriate to the current context.
000117139 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/RYC2018-025860-I
000117139 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
000117139 590__ $$a5.4$$b2022
000117139 592__ $$a1.664$$b2022
000117139 591__ $$aSOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY$$b5 / 110 = 0.045$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000117139 593__ $$aEducation$$c2022$$dQ1
000117139 594__ $$a5.8$$b2022
000117139 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000117139 700__ $$aKhalfaoui, Andrea
000117139 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3252-076X$$aValero, Diana$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000117139 700__ $$aRedondo-Sama, Gisela
000117139 7102_ $$14009$$2813$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Trabajo Social y Serv.Soc
000117139 773__ $$g21 (2022), [10 pp.]$$pInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods, The$$tInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods, The$$x1609-4069
000117139 8564_ $$s580117$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/117139/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000117139 8564_ $$s2357312$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/117139/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000117139 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:117139$$particulos$$pdriver
000117139 951__ $$a2024-03-18-13:16:44
000117139 980__ $$aARTICLE