000117442 001__ 117442
000117442 005__ 20240319080958.0
000117442 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.02.008
000117442 0248_ $$2sideral$$a127381
000117442 037__ $$aART-2022-127381
000117442 041__ $$aspa
000117442 100__ $$aRodríguez Eguizabal E.
000117442 245__ $$aCapacidad de respuesta del sistema de salud en atención primaria valorada por pacientes con enfermedades crónicas
000117442 260__ $$c2022
000117442 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000117442 5203_ $$aObjective: To evaluate the health systems’ response capacity according to the perception of chronic patients, and the factors related to that perception. Method: Source of data: patients diagnosed with at least one chronic disease who visited primary care centers during June and July 2015 in a basic health area of La Rioja. Design: cross-sectional descriptive study based on interviews to over 18s who visited primary care centers. The dependent variable was the health systems’ response capacity and independent variables were sociodemographic and health related. In order to collect data, trained interviewers conducted a short questionnaire in Spanish from the World Health Organization Multi-country Survey Study with 403 subjects. Descriptive statistics, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Results: The overall health systems’ response capacity was considered good by 87.10%. The domains that scored highest were: confidentiality (99.3%), dignity (98.3%) and communication (97.3%). Those evaluated worst were: rapid service (38, 6%) and quality of basic services (31.8%). Low social class was the most important factor associated with the responsiveness, mainly with autonomy and rapid service. Sex, educational level, and occupation were related to communication domain, and patients with worse perceived health rated the general response worse. The domains considered most important were dignity (33.5%) and rapid service (30.5%). Conclusions: The domains best evaluated were those related to respect for people. Rapid service has a low health systems’ response capacity, but a high importance, and therefore requires priority action. © 2021 SESPAS
000117442 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000117442 590__ $$a1.9$$b2022
000117442 592__ $$a0.473$$b2022
000117442 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b133 / 180 = 0.739$$c2022$$dQ3$$eT3
000117442 593__ $$aPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health$$c2022$$dQ3
000117442 591__ $$aHEALTH POLICY & SERVICES$$b66 / 87 = 0.759$$c2022$$dQ4$$eT3
000117442 591__ $$aHEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES$$b84 / 106 = 0.792$$c2022$$dQ4$$eT3
000117442 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b162 / 207 = 0.783$$c2022$$dQ4$$eT3
000117442 594__ $$a3.3$$b2022
000117442 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000117442 700__ $$aGil de Gómez M.J.
000117442 700__ $$aSan Sebastián M.
000117442 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-6565-9699$$aOliván-Blázquez B.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000117442 700__ $$aCoronado Vázquez V.
000117442 700__ $$aSánchez Calavera M.A.
000117442 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-5494-6550$$aMagallón Botaya R.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000117442 7102_ $$14009$$2740$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicología Social
000117442 7102_ $$11007$$2610$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Medicina, Psiqu. y Derm.$$cArea Medicina
000117442 773__ $$g36, 3 (2022), 232-239$$pGac. sanit.$$tGaceta Sanitaria$$x0213-9111
000117442 8564_ $$s804773$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/117442/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000117442 8564_ $$s2488331$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/117442/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000117442 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:117442$$particulos$$pdriver
000117442 951__ $$a2024-03-18-13:53:12
000117442 980__ $$aARTICLE