<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.3390/cancers14102374</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Morote, Juan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Borque-Fernando, Angel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Triquell, Marina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Celma, Anna</dc:creator><dc:creator>Regis, Lucas</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mast, Richard</dc:creator><dc:creator>de Torres, Inés M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Semidey, María E.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Abascal, José M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Servian, Pol</dc:creator><dc:creator>Santamaría, Anna</dc:creator><dc:creator>Planas, Jacques</dc:creator><dc:creator>Esteban, Luis M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Trilla, Enrique</dc:creator><dc:title>Comparative Analysis of PSA Density and an MRI-Based Predictive Model to Improve the Selection of Candidates for Prostate Biopsy</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2022-128599</dc:identifier><dc:description>This study is a head-to-head comparison between mPSAD and MRI-PMbdex. The MRI-PMbdex was created from 2432 men with suspected PCa; this cohort comprised the development and external validation cohorts of the Barcelona MRI predictive model. Pre-biopsy 3-Tesla multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and 2 to 4-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for suspicious lesions and/or 12-core TRUS systematic biopsies were scheduled. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa), defined as Gleason-based Grade Group 2 or higher, was detected in 934 men (38.4%). The area under the curve was 0.893 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.880–0.906) for MRI-PMbdex and 0.764 (95% CI: 0.774–0.783) for mPSAD, with p &lt; 0.001. MRI-PMbdex showed net benefit over biopsy in all men when the probability of csPCa was greater than 2%, while mPSAD did the same when the probability of csPCa was greater than 18%. Thresholds of 13.5% for MRI-PMbdex and 0.628 ng/mL2 for mPSAD had 95% sensitivity for csPCa and presented 51.1% specificity for MRI-PMbdex and 19.6% specificity for mPSAD, with p &lt; 0.001. MRI-PMbdex exhibited net benefit over mPSAD in men with prostate imaging report and data system (PI-RADS) &lt;4, while neither exhibited any benefit in men with PI-RADS 5. Hence, we can conclude that MRI-PMbdex is more accurate than mPSAD for the proper selection of candidates for prostate biopsy among men with suspected PCa, with the exception of men with a PI-RAD S 5 score, for whom neither tool exhibited clinical guidance to determine the need for biopsy.</dc:description><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/117652</dc:source><dc:doi>10.3390/cancers14102374</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/117652</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:117652</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/PI20/01666</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Cancers 14, 10 (2022), 2374 [22 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>