<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100851</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Biccler, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bollaerts, K.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vora, P.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sole, E.</dc:creator><dc:creator>García Rodriguez, L.A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lanas, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Langley, R.E.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Soriano Gabarró, M.</dc:creator><dc:title>Public health impact of low-dose aspirin on colorectal cancer, cardiovascular disease and safety in the UK – Results from micro-simulation model</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2021-127043</dc:identifier><dc:description>Background: Low-dose aspirin therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease and may have a positive effect on the prevention of colorectal cancer. We evaluated the population-level expected effect of regular low-dose aspirin use on cardiovascular disease (CVD), colorectal cancer (CRC), gastrointestinal bleeding, symptomatic peptic ulcers, and intracranial hemorrhage, using a microsimulation study design. Methods: We used individual-level state transition modeling to assess the impact of aspirin in populations aged 50–59 or 60–69 years old indicated for low-dose aspirin usage for primary or secondary CVD prevention. Model parameters were based on data from governmental agencies from the UK or recent publications. Results: In the 50–59 years cohort, a decrease in incidence rates (IRs per 100 000 person years) of non-fatal CVD (-203 and -794) and fatal CVD (-97 and-381) was reported in the primary and secondary CVD prevention setting, respectively. The IR reduction of CRC (-96 and -93) was similar for primary and secondary CVD prevention. The IR increase of non-fatal (116 and 119) and fatal safety events (6 and 6) was similar for primary and secondary CVD prevention. Similar results were obtained for the 60–69 years cohort. Conclusions: The decrease in fatal CVD and CRC events was larger than the increase in fatal safety events and this difference was more pronounced when low-dose aspirin was used for secondary compared to primary CVD prevention. These results provide a comprehensive image of the expected effect of regular low-dose aspirin therapy in a UK population indicated to use aspirin for CVD prevention. © 2021</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/117948</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100851</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/117948</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:117948</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>IJC Heart and Vasculature 36 (2021), 100851 [8 pp]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>