000118075 001__ 118075
000118075 005__ 20240319080954.0
000118075 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102762
000118075 0248_ $$2sideral$$a128716
000118075 037__ $$aART-2022-128716
000118075 041__ $$aeng
000118075 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3284-6065$$aSanz-Hernández, A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000118075 245__ $$aGender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review
000118075 260__ $$c2022
000118075 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000118075 5203_ $$aA social vision is slowly emerging of the bioeconomy as an avenue towards sustainability. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature on the connection between gender (as a social dimension) and bioeconomy. We have reviewed 244 scientific publications which explicitly mention bioeconomy and gender/women in their title, abstract, keywords or text; 127 documents were identified as having high (19) or medium (108) gender-oriented centrality. The literature is fragmented but six cross-sectional key themes have been identified: Gender and social impacts of the bioeconomy; gender equality as a goal and a just policy; gender differences in perceptions, discourses and strategies relating to the bioeconomy; women as potential stakeholders and actors in the transition towards bioeconomy; frameworks, strategies, and tools to connect gender and the bioeconomy; and gender inequalities and geography. Moreover, they show hardly any connection with the three predominant social currents in the struggle for gender equality: grassroots social movements, ecofeminism, and intersectionality. The paper concludes by identifying key pathways for future research to address current gaps. We suggest integrating a feminist metatheoretical base with an integrative ontology, an epistemology that recognises its own partiality and situationality, and a methodology sensitive to the specificities of the contexts which are committed to the goal of transforming women''s everyday contexts. © 2022
000118075 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000118075 590__ $$a4.0$$b2022
000118075 592__ $$a1.124$$b2022
000118075 591__ $$aFORESTRY$$b6 / 69 = 0.087$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000118075 593__ $$aEconomics and Econometrics$$c2022$$dQ1
000118075 591__ $$aECONOMICS$$b84 / 380 = 0.221$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000118075 593__ $$aSociology and Political Science$$c2022$$dQ1
000118075 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES$$b45 / 128 = 0.352$$c2022$$dQ2$$eT2
000118075 593__ $$aManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law$$c2022$$dQ1
000118075 593__ $$aForestry$$c2022$$dQ1
000118075 594__ $$a8.3$$b2022
000118075 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000118075 700__ $$aJiménez-Caballero, P.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000118075 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-2629-9114$$aZarauz, I.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000118075 7102_ $$14009$$2775$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Sociología
000118075 773__ $$g141 (2022), 102762 [15 pp.]$$pForest Policy Econ.$$tFOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS$$x1389-9341
000118075 8564_ $$s2057289$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/118075/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000118075 8564_ $$s2536418$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/118075/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000118075 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:118075$$particulos$$pdriver
000118075 951__ $$a2024-03-18-13:26:04
000118075 980__ $$aARTICLE