<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102762</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Sanz-Hernández, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jiménez-Caballero, P.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zarauz, I.</dc:creator><dc:title>Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2022-128716</dc:identifier><dc:description>A social vision is slowly emerging of the bioeconomy as an avenue towards sustainability. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature on the connection between gender (as a social dimension) and bioeconomy. We have reviewed 244 scientific publications which explicitly mention bioeconomy and gender/women in their title, abstract, keywords or text; 127 documents were identified as having high (19) or medium (108) gender-oriented centrality. The literature is fragmented but six cross-sectional key themes have been identified: Gender and social impacts of the bioeconomy; gender equality as a goal and a just policy; gender differences in perceptions, discourses and strategies relating to the bioeconomy; women as potential stakeholders and actors in the transition towards bioeconomy; frameworks, strategies, and tools to connect gender and the bioeconomy; and gender inequalities and geography. Moreover, they show hardly any connection with the three predominant social currents in the struggle for gender equality: grassroots social movements, ecofeminism, and intersectionality. The paper concludes by identifying key pathways for future research to address current gaps. We suggest integrating a feminist metatheoretical base with an integrative ontology, an epistemology that recognises its own partiality and situationality, and a methodology sensitive to the specificities of the contexts which are committed to the goal of transforming women''s everyday contexts. © 2022</dc:description><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/118075</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102762</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/118075</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:118075</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS 141 (2022), 102762 [15 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>