Estudios
I+D+I
Institución
Internacional
Vida Universitaria
Repositorio Institucional de Documentos
Buscar
Enviar
Personalizar
Sus alertas
Sus carpetas
Sus búsquedas
Ayuda
EN
/
ES
Página principal
>
Artículos
> Comparison of economic performance of lead-acid and li-ion batteries in standalone photovoltaic energy systems
Estadísticas de uso
Gráficos
Comparison of economic performance of lead-acid and li-ion batteries in standalone photovoltaic energy systems
Carroquino J.
;
Escriche-Martínez C.
;
Valiño, L.
;
Dufo-López, R.
(Universidad de Zaragoza)
Resumen:
Standalone renewable energy systems usually incorporate batteries to get a steady energy supply. Currently, Li-ion batteries are gradually displacing lead-acid ones. In practice, the choice is made without previous comparison of its profitability in each case. This work compares the economic performance of both types of battery, in five real case studies with different demand profiles. For each case, two sets of simulations are carried out. In one of the sets, the energy demand is supplied by a standalone photovoltaic system and, in the other one, by a standalone hybrid photovoltaic-diesel system. Through optimization processes, the economic optimum solutions are obtained. In addition, sensitivity analyses on various parameters have been carried out, seeking the influence in favor of one or another type of battery. The results show that if the type of battery is changed, to achieve the economic optimum the entire system must be resized. In some cases, the economic optimum is reached with Li-ion and in others with lead-acid batteries, depending on the demand profiles. Thus, both types of batteries can be profitable options in standalone energy systems, with a greater tendency to lead-acid in fully photovoltaic systems and to Li-ion in hybrids. The price reductions that would make Li-ion the only choice is quantified. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Idioma:
Inglés
DOI:
10.3390/app11083587
Año:
2021
Publicado en:
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
11, 8 (2021), 3587 [27 pp]
ISSN:
2076-3417
Factor impacto JCR:
2.838 (2021)
Categ. JCR:
ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
rank: 39 / 92 = 0.424
(2021)
- Q2
- T2
Categ. JCR:
PHYSICS, APPLIED
rank: 76 / 161 = 0.472
(2021)
- Q2
- T2
Categ. JCR:
MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
rank: 218 / 345 = 0.632
(2021)
- Q3
- T2
Categ. JCR:
CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
rank: 100 / 180 = 0.556
(2021)
- Q3
- T2
Factor impacto CITESCORE:
3.7 -
Engineering
(Q2) -
Materials Science
(Q2) -
Chemical Engineering
(Q2) -
Computer Science
(Q2) -
Physics and Astronomy
(Q2)
Factor impacto SCIMAGO:
0.507 -
Engineering (miscellaneous)
(Q2) -
Computer Science Applications
(Q2) -
Process Chemistry and Technology
(Q2) -
Materials Science (miscellaneous)
(Q2) -
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
(Q2)
Tipo y forma:
Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento):
Área Ingeniería Eléctrica
(
Dpto. Ingeniería Eléctrica
)
Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
Exportado de SIDERAL (2023-05-18-15:38:23)
Enlace permanente:
Copiar
Visitas y descargas
Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos
Volver a la búsqueda
Registro creado el 2022-09-14, última modificación el 2023-05-19
Versión publicada:
PDF
Valore este documento:
Rate this document:
1
2
3
4
5
(Sin ninguna reseña)
Añadir a una carpeta personal
Exportar como
BibTeX
,
MARC
,
MARCXML
,
DC
,
EndNote
,
NLM
,
RefWorks