000118280 001__ 118280
000118280 005__ 20240319081018.0
000118280 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/ani12131620
000118280 0248_ $$2sideral$$a129557
000118280 037__ $$aART-2022-129557
000118280 041__ $$aeng
000118280 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3017-3012$$aBernad-Roche, M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000118280 245__ $$aSalmonella Shedding in Slaughter Pigs and the Use of Esterified Formic Acid in the Drinking Water as a Potential Abattoir-Based Mitigation Measure
000118280 260__ $$c2022
000118280 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000118280 5203_ $$aPigs shedding Salmonella at slaughter are considered a source of carcass contamination and human infection. To assess this potential risk, the proportion of Salmonella shedders that arrive for slaughter was evaluated in a population of 1068 pigs from 24 farms. Shedding was present in 27.3% of the pigs, and the monophasic variant of Salmonella Typhimurium, an emerging zoonotic serotype, was the most prevalent (46.9%). Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Salmonella isolates was common, but few isolates showed AMR to antimicrobials of critical importance for humans such as third-generation cephalosporins (5%), colistin (0%), or carbapenems (0%). However, AMR to tigecycline was moderately high (15%). The efficacy of an esterified formic acid in the lairage drinking water (3 kg formic acid/1000 L) was also assessed as a potential abattoir-based strategy to reduce Salmonella shedding. It was able to reduce the proportion of shedders (60.7% in the control group (CG) vs. 44.3% in the treatment group (TG); p < 0.01). After considering clustering and confounding factors, the odds of shedding Salmonella in the CG were 2.75 (95% CI = 1.80–4.21) times higher than those of the TG, suggesting a potential efficacy of reduction in shedding as high as 63.6%. This strategy may contribute to mitigating the burden of abattoir environmental contamination.
000118280 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/RTI2018-093915-B-I00
000118280 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000118280 590__ $$a3.0$$b2022
000118280 592__ $$a0.684$$b2022
000118280 591__ $$aVETERINARY SCIENCES$$b13 / 144 = 0.09$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000118280 593__ $$aVeterinary (miscellaneous)$$c2022$$dQ1
000118280 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE$$b12 / 62 = 0.194$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000118280 593__ $$aAnimal Science and Zoology$$c2022$$dQ1
000118280 594__ $$a4.2$$b2022
000118280 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000118280 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9340-0665$$aCasanova-Higes, A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000118280 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1974-9025$$aMarín-Alcalá, C.M.
000118280 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-5442-7702$$aMainar-Jaime, R.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000118280 7102_ $$11009$$2773$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Patología Animal$$cÁrea Sanidad Animal
000118280 773__ $$g12, 13 (2022), 1620 [16 pp.]$$pAnimals (Basel)$$tAnimals$$x2076-2615
000118280 8564_ $$s467211$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/118280/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000118280 8564_ $$s2724764$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/118280/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000118280 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:118280$$particulos$$pdriver
000118280 951__ $$a2024-03-18-15:55:40
000118280 980__ $$aARTICLE