<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.3390/ijerph18084143</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Chong Y.Y.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Chien W.T.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cheng H.Y.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lamnisos D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lubenko J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Presti G.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Squatrito V.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Constantinou M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Nicolaou C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Papacostas S.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Aydin G.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ruiz F.J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Garcia-Martin M.B.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Obando-Posada D.P.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Segura-Vargas M.A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vasiliou V.S.</dc:creator><dc:creator>McHugh L.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Höfer S.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Baban A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Neto D.D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>da Silva A.N.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Monestès J.-L.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Alvarez-Galvez J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Blarrina M.P.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Montesinos F.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Valdivia Salas S.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ori D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kleszcz B.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lappalainen R.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ivanovic I.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gosar D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dionne F.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Merwin R.M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gloster A.T.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Karekla M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kassianos A.P.</dc:creator><dc:title>Patterns of psychological responses among the public during the early phase of COVID-19: A cross-regional analysis</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2021-126906</dc:identifier><dc:description>This study aimed to compare the mediation of psychological flexibility, prosociality and coping in the impacts of illness perceptions toward COVID-19 on mental health among seven regions. Convenience sampled online survey was conducted between April and June 2020 from 9130 citizens in 21 countries. Illness perceptions toward COVID-19, psychological flexibility, prosociality, coping and mental health, socio-demographics, lockdown-related variables and COVID-19 status were assessed. Results showed that psychological flexibility was the only significant mediator in the relationship between illness perceptions toward COVID-19 and mental health across all regions (all ps = 0.001–0.021). Seeking social support was the significant mediator across subgroups (all ps range = &lt;0.001–0.005) except from the Hong Kong sample (p = 0.06) and the North and South American sample (p = 0.53). No mediation was found for problem-solving (except from the Northern European sample, p = 0.009). Prosociality was the significant mediator in the Hong Kong sample (p =0.016) and the Eastern European sample (p = 0.008). These findings indicate that fostering psychological flexibility may help to mitigate the adverse mental impacts of COVID-19 across regions. Roles of seeking social support, problem-solving and prosociality vary across regions. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/118638</dc:source><dc:doi>10.3390/ijerph18084143</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/118638</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:118638</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>International journal of environmental research and public health 18, 8 (2021), 4143 [19 pp]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>