Cognitive stimulation and cognitive results in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gómez-Soria, Isabel (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Iguacel, Isabel (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Aguilar-Latorre, Alejandra (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Peralta-Marrupe, Patricia (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Latorre, Eva (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Cuenca Zaldívar, Juan Nicolás ; Calatayud, Estela (Universidad de Zaragoza)
Resumen: Background and Purpose
The lack of cognitive activity accelerates age cognitive decline. Cognitive stimulation (CS) tries to enhance cognitive functioning. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of CS on cognitive outcomes (general cognitive functioning and specific cognitive domains) in older adults (aged 65 years or older, cognitively healthy participants, or with mild cognitive impairment, or dementia).
Methods
PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were examined from inception to October 2021. A total of 1,997 studies were identified in these databases, and. 33 studies were finally included in the systematic review and the meta-analysis. Raw means and standard deviations were used for continuous outcomes. Publication bias was examined by Egger's Regression Test for Funnel Plot Asymmetry and the quality assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health.
Results
CS significantly improves general cognitive functioning (mean difference=MD = 1.536, 95%CI, 0.832 to 2.240), memory (MD = 0.365, 95%CI, 0.300 to 0.430), orientation (MD = 0.428, 95%CI, 0.306 to 0.550), praxis (MD = 0.278, 95%CI, 0.094 to 0.462) and calculation (MD = 0.228, 95%CI, 0.112 to 0.343).
Conclusion
CS seems to increase general cognitive functioning, memory, orientation, praxis, and calculation in older adults.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104807
Año: 2023
Publicado en: ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS 104 (2023), 104807 [22 p.]
ISSN: 0167-4943
Factor impacto JCR: 3.5 (2023)
Categ. JCR: GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY rank: 29 / 74 = 0.392 (2023) - Q2 - T2
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.054 - Gerontology (Q1) - Health (social science) (Q1) - Aging (Q2) - Geriatrics and Gerontology (Q2)
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Enfermería (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)
Área (Departamento): Área Fisioterapia (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)
Área (Departamento): Área Psicolog.Evolut.Educac (Dpto. Psicología y Sociología)
Área (Departamento): Área Biología Celular (Dpto. Bioq.Biolog.Mol. Celular)
Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.
Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-07-19-18:37:06)
Visitas y descargas
The lack of cognitive activity accelerates age cognitive decline. Cognitive stimulation (CS) tries to enhance cognitive functioning. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of CS on cognitive outcomes (general cognitive functioning and specific cognitive domains) in older adults (aged 65 years or older, cognitively healthy participants, or with mild cognitive impairment, or dementia).
Methods
PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were examined from inception to October 2021. A total of 1,997 studies were identified in these databases, and. 33 studies were finally included in the systematic review and the meta-analysis. Raw means and standard deviations were used for continuous outcomes. Publication bias was examined by Egger's Regression Test for Funnel Plot Asymmetry and the quality assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health.
Results
CS significantly improves general cognitive functioning (mean difference=MD = 1.536, 95%CI, 0.832 to 2.240), memory (MD = 0.365, 95%CI, 0.300 to 0.430), orientation (MD = 0.428, 95%CI, 0.306 to 0.550), praxis (MD = 0.278, 95%CI, 0.094 to 0.462) and calculation (MD = 0.228, 95%CI, 0.112 to 0.343).
Conclusion
CS seems to increase general cognitive functioning, memory, orientation, praxis, and calculation in older adults.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104807
Año: 2023
Publicado en: ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS 104 (2023), 104807 [22 p.]
ISSN: 0167-4943
Factor impacto JCR: 3.5 (2023)
Categ. JCR: GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY rank: 29 / 74 = 0.392 (2023) - Q2 - T2
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.054 - Gerontology (Q1) - Health (social science) (Q1) - Aging (Q2) - Geriatrics and Gerontology (Q2)
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Enfermería (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)
Área (Departamento): Área Fisioterapia (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)
Área (Departamento): Área Psicolog.Evolut.Educac (Dpto. Psicología y Sociología)
Área (Departamento): Área Biología Celular (Dpto. Bioq.Biolog.Mol. Celular)
Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-07-19-18:37:06)
Enlace permanente:
Visitas y descargas
Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos
Registro creado el 2022-10-06, última modificación el 2024-07-20