000119810 001__ 119810
000119810 005__ 20240705134136.0
000119810 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.140
000119810 0248_ $$2sideral$$a130702
000119810 037__ $$aART-2023-130702
000119810 041__ $$aeng
000119810 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-7293-318X$$aOsma, J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000119810 245__ $$aMultidimensional emotional disorders inventory: Reliability and validity in a Spanish clinical sample
000119810 260__ $$c2023
000119810 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000119810 5203_ $$aBackground: The categorical approach to diagnosing mental disorders has been criticized for a number of reasons (e.g., high rates of comorbidity; larger number of diagnostic categories and combination). Diverse alternatives have been proposed using a hybrid or totally dimensional perspective. Despite the evidence supporting use of the Multidimensional Emotional Disorders Inventory (MEDI) for assessing the transdiagnostic dimensions of Emotional Disorders using a dimensional-categorical hybrid approach, no data exist on Spanish clinical samples. The present study explores the validity and reliability of the 49-item MEDI in a clinical sample and provides data for its use. Methods: A total of 280 outpatients with emotional disorders attended in different Spanish public Mental Health Units in Spain filled out all questionnaires during the assessment phase and the MEDI again one week after. The instruments used evaluate four main constructs: personality, mood, anxiety and avoidance. Results: The nine original factors were confirmed and showed adequate reliability (α: 0.66–0.91) and stability (r = 0.76–0.87). No differences in mean scores by sex were presented in any subscale (p ≥ .07). The MEDI subscales correlated significantly with the scales of each of the selected constructs (0.45 < r < 0.76). Limitations: The main limitations of this study were the limited sample size and not being able to count on MEDI scores post-transdiagnostic intervention. Conclusions: The MEDI demonstrates adequate reliability and validity. It allows to assess diverse symptoms efficiently, thus being of interest for clinical studies and practice.
000119810 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII-FEDER/PI20-00697$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA-FEDER/S31-20D
000119810 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000119810 592__ $$a2.082$$b2023
000119810 593__ $$aPsychiatry and Mental Health$$c2023$$dQ1
000119810 593__ $$aClinical Psychology$$c2023$$dQ1
000119810 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000119810 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0403-5273$$aMartínez-Loredo, V.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000119810 700__ $$aQuilez-Orden, A.
000119810 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-2437-1207$$aPeris-Baquero, O.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000119810 700__ $$aFerreres-Galán, V.
000119810 700__ $$aPrado-Abril, J.
000119810 700__ $$aTorres-Alfosea, M.A.
000119810 700__ $$aRosellini, A.J.
000119810 7102_ $$14009$$2680$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló.
000119810 773__ $$g320 (2023), 65-73$$pJ. affect. disord.$$tJournal of Affective Disorders$$x0165-0327
000119810 8564_ $$s517830$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/119810/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000119810 8564_ $$s2432993$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/119810/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000119810 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:119810$$particulos$$pdriver
000119810 951__ $$a2024-07-05-12:45:46
000119810 980__ $$aARTICLE