000120138 001__ 120138
000120138 005__ 20230622083320.0
000120138 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1515/psicl-2021-0023
000120138 0248_ $$2sideral$$a125702
000120138 037__ $$aART-2021-125702
000120138 041__ $$aeng
000120138 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-8966-1013$$aMur-Dueñas, P.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000120138 245__ $$aEngagement markers in research project websites: Promoting interactivity and dialogicity
000120138 260__ $$c2021
000120138 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000120138 5203_ $$aScholars are currently not only required to produce primary output, i.e. peer-reviewed research articles, chapters or books, which constitutes certified and legitimised knowledge (Puschmann 2015), but also to disseminate such output, which is frequently carried out digitally and in English. In this context it is the aim of this paper to gain insights into scholars'' digital discursive practices by analysing academic websites of research projects funded under the European H2020 programme. More specifically, it explores the ways in which a potentially wide, blurred audience is addressed by means of engagement markers, particularly, reader pronouns, questions, and directives, including imperatives, obligation modals and adjectival phrases expressing necessity. Results indicate that the frequency of use of engagement markers varies across websites and that it may affect their degree of potential interactivity. They further show that some engagement markers are more common than others and that they tend to display specific rhetorical purposes. Differences on their use and function when compared to their use in RA writing are also shown. It is concluded that these interpersonality features have an important role in the potential promotion of dialogicity in this digital medium, and crafting an effective professional identity of the research teams.
000120138 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/H16-20R$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO-FEDER/FFI2017-84205
000120138 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000120138 590__ $$a0.4$$b2021
000120138 591__ $$aLINGUISTICS$$b175 / 195 = 0.897$$c2021$$dQ4$$eT3
000120138 592__ $$a0.173$$b2021
000120138 593__ $$aLinguistics and Language$$c2021$$dQ2
000120138 594__ $$a0.8$$b2021
000120138 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000120138 7102_ $$13004$$2345$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Filolog.Inglesa y Alema.$$cÁrea Filología Inglesa
000120138 773__ $$g57, 4 (2021), 655-676$$pPozn. Stud. Contemp. Linguist.$$tPoznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics$$x1732-0747
000120138 8564_ $$s530899$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/120138/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000120138 8564_ $$s1283826$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/120138/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000120138 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:120138$$particulos$$pdriver
000120138 951__ $$a2023-06-21-15:03:00
000120138 980__ $$aARTICLE