Association between Body Mass Index and the Use of Digital Platforms to Record Food Intake: Cross-Sectional Analysis

Tricás-Vidal, Héctor José ; Vidal-Peracho, María Concepción (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Lucha-López, María Orosia (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Hidalgo-García, César (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Monti-Ballano, Sofía (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Márquez-Gonzalvo, Sergio (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel (Universidad de Zaragoza)

Resumen: An inadequate diet has been shown to be a cause of obesity. Nowadays, digital resources are replacing traditional methods of recording food consumption. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze a sample of United States of America (USA) residents to determine if the usage of any meal tracker platform to record food intake was related to an improved body mass index (BMI). An analytical cross-sectional study that included 896 subjects with an Instagram account who enrolled to participate in an anonymous online survey was performed. Any meal tracker platform used to record food intake over the last month was employed by 34.2% of the sample. A total of 85.3% of the participants who had tracked their food intake were women (p < 0.001), and 33.3% (p = 0.018) had a doctorate degree. Participants who used any meal tracker platform also had higher BMIs (median: 24.9 (Q1: 22.7–Q3: 27.9), p < 0.001), invested more hours a week on Instagram looking over nutrition or physical activity (median: 2.0 (Q1: 1.0–Q3: 4.0), p = 0.028) and performed more minutes per week of strong physical activity (median: 240.0 (Q1: 135.0–Q3: 450.0), p = 0.007). Conclusions: USA residents with an Instagram account who had been using any meal tracker platform to record food intake were predominantly highly educated women. They had higher BMIs despite the fact they were engaged in stronger exercise and invested more hours a week on Instagram looking over nutrition or physical activity.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.3390/app122312144

Año: 2022

Publicado en: Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 12, 23 (2022), 12144 [12 pp.]
ISSN: 2076-3417

Factor impacto JCR: 2.7 (2022)

Categ. JCR: PHYSICS, APPLIED rank: 78 / 160 = 0.488 (2022) - Q2 - T2
Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY rank: 42 / 90 = 0.467 (2022) - Q2 - T2
Categ. JCR: CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY rank: 100 / 178 = 0.562 (2022) - Q3 - T2
Categ. JCR: MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY rank: 208 / 343 = 0.606 (2022) - Q3 - T2

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 4.5 - Engineering (Q2) - Materials Science (Q2) - Chemical Engineering (Q2) - Computer Science (Q2) - Physics and Astronomy (Q2)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.492 - Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (Q2) - Materials Science (miscellaneous) (Q2) - Engineering (miscellaneous) (Q2) - Instrumentation (Q2) - Process Chemistry and Technology (Q3) - Computer Science Applications (Q3)

Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)

Área (Departamento): Area Medicina (Dpto. Medicina, Psiqu. y Derm.)
Área (Departamento): Área Fisioterapia (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)