000121306 001__ 121306
000121306 005__ 20240319080956.0
000121306 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150329
000121306 0248_ $$2sideral$$a128074
000121306 037__ $$aART-2022-128074
000121306 041__ $$aeng
000121306 100__ $$aCazcarro Castellano, Ignacio
000121306 245__ $$aEnergy-socio-economic-environmental modelling for the EU energy and post-COVID-19 transitions
000121306 260__ $$c2022
000121306 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000121306 5203_ $$aRelevant energy questions have arisen because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic shock leads to emissions'' reductions consistent with the rates of decrease required to achieve the Paris Agreement goals. Those unforeseen drastic reductions in emissions are temporary as long as they do not involve structural changes. However, the COVID-19 consequences and the subsequent policy response will affect the economy for decades. Focusing on the EU, this discussion article argues how recovery plans are an opportunity to deepen the way towards a low-carbon economy, improving at the same time employment, health, and equity and the role of modelling tools. Long-term alignment with the low-carbon path and the development of a resilient transition towards renewable sources should guide instruments and policies, conditioning aid to energy-intensive sectors such as transport, tourism, and the automotive industry. However, the potential dangers of short-termism and carbon leakage persist. The current energy-socio-economic-environmental modelling tools are precious to widen the scope and deal with these complex problems. The scientific community has to assess disparate, non-equilibrium, and non-ordinary scenarios, such as sectors and countries lockdowns, drastic changes in con sumption patterns, significant investments in renewable energies, and disruptive technologies and incorporate uncertainty analysis. All these instruments will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of decarbonization options and potential consequences on employment, income distribution, and vulnerability. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
000121306 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/AEI/MDM-2017-0714$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/PID2019-106822RB-I00$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/RED2018-102794-T$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/RTI2018-099858-A-I00
000121306 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000121306 590__ $$a9.8$$b2022
000121306 592__ $$a1.946$$b2022
000121306 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES$$b26 / 275 = 0.095$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000121306 593__ $$aEnvironmental Chemistry$$c2022$$dQ1
000121306 593__ $$aWaste Management and Disposal$$c2022$$dQ1
000121306 593__ $$aPollution$$c2022$$dQ1
000121306 593__ $$aEnvironmental Engineering$$c2022$$dQ1
000121306 594__ $$a16.8$$b2022
000121306 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000121306 700__ $$aGarcia-Gusano, Diego
000121306 700__ $$aIribarren, Diego
000121306 700__ $$aLinares, Pedro
000121306 700__ $$aCarlos Romero, Jose
000121306 700__ $$aArocena, Pablo
000121306 700__ $$aArto, Inaki
000121306 700__ $$aBanacloche, Santacruz
000121306 700__ $$aLechon, Yolanda
000121306 700__ $$aJavier Miguel, Luis
000121306 700__ $$aZafrilla, Jorge
000121306 700__ $$aLopez, Luis-Antonio
000121306 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0754-4046$$aLangarita Tejero, Raquel$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000121306 700__ $$aCadarso, Maria-Angeles
000121306 7102_ $$14000$$2415$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Análisis Económico$$cÁrea Fund. Análisis Económico
000121306 773__ $$g805 (2022), 150329 [8 pp]$$pSci. total environ.$$tSCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT$$x0048-9697
000121306 8564_ $$s258216$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/121306/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000121306 8564_ $$s1892926$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/121306/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000121306 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:121306$$particulos$$pdriver
000121306 951__ $$a2024-03-18-13:38:37
000121306 980__ $$aARTICLE