000121339 001__ 121339
000121339 005__ 20240731103311.0
000121339 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/ijerph20021439
000121339 0248_ $$2sideral$$a132053
000121339 037__ $$aART-2023-132053
000121339 041__ $$aeng
000121339 100__ $$aPérez-Belmunt, Albert
000121339 245__ $$aFoam rolling vs. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching in the hamstring flexibility of amateur athletes: control trials
000121339 260__ $$c2023
000121339 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000121339 5203_ $$aBackground: the use of stretching techniques in the sports world is frequent and common thanks to their many effects. One of the main benefits of stretching is an increased range of motion (ROM). Recently, the use of a foam roller has spread in sports practice due to benefits that are similar to those of shoes observed in stretching. The objective of the following study was to compare the results of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching (PNF) with foam rolling (FR). Methods: The design of the study was a single-blind, randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrial.gov NCT05134883), and the participants were 80 healthy young athletes. The range of motion was evaluated with a modified sit-and-reach test before, during (at 30 s), and at the end of the intervention (at 2 min). The subject’s discomfort sensation was measured using the Borg scale. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d coefficient. Volunteers were randomized into the PNF group or FR group. Results: the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001) during the intervention in favor of PNF group. The differences at the end of intervention showed that the PNF group had a greater increase in flexibility, with this difference being statically significant (p < 0.001). The sensation of perceived exertion with PNF at the end of the intervention was similarly classified as moderate for both groups. Conclusion: Despite the fact that the use of FR is spreading in the field of sports and rehabilitation, the results of the present study suggest that the gain in flexibility in the hamstrings is greater if PNF-type stretches are used instead of FR.
000121339 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000121339 592__ $$a0.808$$b2023
000121339 593__ $$aHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis$$c2023$$dQ2
000121339 593__ $$aPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health$$c2023$$dQ2
000121339 593__ $$aPollution$$c2023$$dQ2
000121339 594__ $$a7.3$$b2023
000121339 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000121339 700__ $$aCasasayas-Cos, Oriol
000121339 700__ $$aRagazzi, Paolo
000121339 700__ $$aRodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
000121339 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-7667-2178$$aHidalgo-García, César$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000121339 700__ $$aCanet-Vintró, Max
000121339 700__ $$aCaballero-Martínez, Iván
000121339 700__ $$aPacheco, Laura
000121339 700__ $$aLópez-De-Celis, Carlos
000121339 7102_ $$11006$$2413$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Fisioterapia
000121339 773__ $$g20, 2 (2023), 1439 [9 pp.]$$pInt. j. environ. res. public health$$tInternational journal of environmental research and public health$$x1661-7827
000121339 8564_ $$s371669$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/121339/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000121339 8564_ $$s2456979$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/121339/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000121339 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:121339$$particulos$$pdriver
000121339 951__ $$a2024-07-31-09:39:37
000121339 980__ $$aARTICLE