000121441 001__ 121441
000121441 005__ 20230602121509.0
000121441 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/vetsci10010061
000121441 0248_ $$2sideral$$a132096
000121441 037__ $$aART-2023-132096
000121441 041__ $$aeng
000121441 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8712-2275$$aVázquez, Francisco José$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000121441 245__ $$aComplications in laparoscopic access in standing horses using cannula and trocar units developed for human medicine
000121441 260__ $$c2023
000121441 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000121441 5203_ $$aFirst cannulation is a critical manoeuvre in equine laparoscopy. This retrospective study aimed at the comparison of the frequency and type of complications detected when using different human laparoscopy devices for laparoscopic access in standing horses, and the influence of body condition in such complications. Forty-four procedures were included, and retrieved data comprised cannula insertion technique, body condition, and type and frequency of complications. Laparoscopic access techniques were classified into five groups: P: pneumoperitoneum created using Veress needle prior to cannulation; T: sharp trocar; D: direct access via surgical incision; V: Visiport optical trocar and H: optical helical cannula (OHC). In groups T, D, V and H, access was achieved without prior induction of pneumoperitoneum. Complications were registered in 13/44 procedures, of which retroperitoneal insufflation was the most common (6/13). Statistically significant association was found between the complication incidence and the type of access, with group D showing the highest complication frequency (80%) and group H the lowest frequency (0%). The majority of complications (9/13) were observed in overweight horses. We conclude that devices designed for human patients can be used for laparoscopic access in standing horses, with the use of OHC minimizing the appearance of complications, especially in overweight horses with OW.
000121441 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000121441 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000121441 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-1286-4968$$aVitoria, Arantza$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000121441 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-9014-6457$$aGómez-Arrue, Javier
000121441 700__ $$aFuente, Sara$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000121441 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-9818-508X$$aBarrachina, Laura$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000121441 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1204-4356$$ade Blas, Ignacio$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000121441 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-7188-0461$$aRomero, Antonio$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000121441 7102_ $$11001$$2420$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Anatom.,Embri.Genét.Ani.$$cÁrea Genética
000121441 7102_ $$11009$$2773$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Patología Animal$$cÁrea Sanidad Animal
000121441 7102_ $$11009$$2617$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Patología Animal$$cÁrea Medicina y Cirugía Animal
000121441 773__ $$g10, 1 (2023), 61 [16 pp.]$$tVeterinary Sciences$$x2306-7381
000121441 8564_ $$s2812838$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/121441/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000121441 8564_ $$s2758390$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/121441/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000121441 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:121441$$particulos$$pdriver
000121441 951__ $$a2023-06-02-11:02:51
000121441 980__ $$aARTICLE